The Frequency Effects of a Relatively Rarely Used Grammar Structure: The Case of Had Better

Abstract

The proposed study aimed to investigate the frequency effects of a relatively rarely used grammar structure, namely had better, and its impact on the process of second language learning. 43 university students participated in the study, who were undergraduate engineering students at a public university in Saudi Arabia. Their English proficiency level ranged between lower-intermediate and upper intermediate. The second language acquisition (SLA) literature indicates that the more frequently a language structure is encountered by a learner, the more likely the successful acquisition of that language structure is, whether this is for the learner's first (L1) or second (L2) language (Ellis, 2002;Gries, 2008). Two modal auxiliary verbs, had better and should, were particularly selected for this study. They were selected because one of them (had better) is rather rarely used (both in spoken and written discourse), whereas the other modal auxiliary (should) is used very frequently. The findings obtained from this study were analyzed in terms of form and meaning relationship. While the findings indicated that only one-third of the participants correctly identified that [‗d] in the [‗d better] pattern corresponded to had, more than half of the students (51%) thought that ['d] corresponded to would. The results for meaning, on the other hand, displayed a very different pattern from the findings for form. 65 percent of the participants correctly identified that -you'd better see a dentist‖ could alternatively be expressed by saying -your teeth are not in a good state. I advise you to see the dentist‖. These findings suggest that learners acquire the meaning of a grammatical pattern significantly more easily than the actual grammatical pattern itself, which means that they had far more trouble with form than meaning. The implication of these findings is multifold, which this article will address. Contribution/ Originality:This study contributes to the existing scholarship in that it investigates a relatively rarely used auxiliary verb (had better) and its impact on second language acquisition. More specifically, it attempts to explore the frequency of -had better‖ especially in terms of form-meaning relationship. INTRODUCTIONThis article aims to investigate the frequency effects of a relatively rarely used grammar structure, namely had better, and its impact on the process of second language learning. The modal auxiliary verb had better occurs only 507 times in the British National Corpus, whereas should, another modal auxiliary verb, which has almost the same meaning as had better, occurs 107, 822 times. In other words, the word should occurs as many as 212 times more than had better. The relatively low frequency of had better compared to should has important pedagogical

Analysis of Factors Affecting Digital Textbook Pricing in Korea

“…Digital textbooks are designed to facilitate the production of diverse multimedia such as audio, interactive games, video, cartoon, animation, 3D graphics, apps and other digital products (Rakab, 2018). To use digital textbooks, students download them from the digital textbook delivery system and keep them in their library (Fig.…”

Organization Culture - Oriented Training Design

“…Weakness indications of the organizational culture implementation in Bandung Polytechnic LP3I can be seen from the declining performance of employees, there are still pretty much going on the fact that less in line with expectations that the low employee work ethic. This can be proved also by the number of employees who are not on time at the office, delaying the office tasks, out of the office during office hours and the employee absenteeism high intensity (Rakab 2018;Shi, et. al., 2018).…”