2013
DOI: 10.1111/irv.12145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The frequency and seasonality of influenza and other respiratory viruses in Tennessee: two influenza seasons of surveillance data, 2010–2012

Abstract: BackgroundIn 2010, the Tennessee Department of Health, in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), expanded influenza surveillance in Tennessee to include other respiratory viruses.ObjectivesTo determine the prevalence and seasonality of influenza and other respiratory viruses during the influenza seasons of 2010–2012.MethodsNasal and nasopharangeal swabs/washings from persons with influenza‐like illness were collected across Tennessee. Influenza and other respiratory viruses we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(12 reference statements)
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary objectives were: (1) to determine whether ARMS-I decreases the frequency of acute URIs, and (2) to assess whether ARMS-I decreases the duration and severity of URI-related symptoms. Secondary objectives were: (1) to assess the tolerability, acceptability and adherence to ARMS-I medications vs. placebo, (2) to compare whether acute URIs in those receiving ARMS-I compared to placebo are associated with differences in absenteeism (from work or school) and visits to physicians' offices, emergency departments and urgent care centers, (3) to determine whether ARMS-I decreases the detection of respiratory viruses by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [36][37][38][39], and (4) to evaluate the effect of ARMS-I on those who did or did not receive the influenza vaccine. The endpoints were: (1) frequency and duration of clinical respiratory disease at study visits and as assisted by electronic patient diaries, (2) intraand extra-oral exams, (3) solicited and unsolicited adverse events, (4) respiratory virus multiplex PCR, and (5) self-report for adherence to medication usage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary objectives were: (1) to determine whether ARMS-I decreases the frequency of acute URIs, and (2) to assess whether ARMS-I decreases the duration and severity of URI-related symptoms. Secondary objectives were: (1) to assess the tolerability, acceptability and adherence to ARMS-I medications vs. placebo, (2) to compare whether acute URIs in those receiving ARMS-I compared to placebo are associated with differences in absenteeism (from work or school) and visits to physicians' offices, emergency departments and urgent care centers, (3) to determine whether ARMS-I decreases the detection of respiratory viruses by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [36][37][38][39], and (4) to evaluate the effect of ARMS-I on those who did or did not receive the influenza vaccine. The endpoints were: (1) frequency and duration of clinical respiratory disease at study visits and as assisted by electronic patient diaries, (2) intraand extra-oral exams, (3) solicited and unsolicited adverse events, (4) respiratory virus multiplex PCR, and (5) self-report for adherence to medication usage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibacterial prescription rates did not vary between groups; however, there was a statistically significant difference between antiviral prescription rates: the FLU-positive group was more likely to be treated with an antiviral agent (80/105 [81%] treated) than were patients in the non-influenza virus pathogen group (6/109 [5.5%]) and the no-pathogen-detected group (2/81 [2.5%]) (P Ͻ 0.001) (254). Respiratory panel use allows for more comprehensive characterization of viruses for general epidemiology/surveillance (15,265) and outbreak investigation. Other, less tangible but important, benefits to respiratory viral panel use may also include improved patient and physician satisfaction with an improved test turnaround time.…”
Section: Molecular Panel Testing For Respiratory Viruses (I) Defininmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…terminating unnecessary antimicrobials and targeted use of antiviral agents [14][15][16][17][18]. From a public health perspective, syndromic respiratory infection testing has shown to be a useful tool for seasonal and sporadic outbreak surveillance and preparedness [19], supporting the effective management of health care resources [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%