1939
DOI: 10.2307/20028952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The French Democratic Tradition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the authors' characterization, the following are conservatives: Andre Siegfried (1939), who defended the French Democratic Tradition by arguing that "for a hundred and fifty years the Revolution has served a basic line of demarcation in the domestic politics of France," and that its principles had to be "defended from a new enemy [i.e., Fascism] along a new battle front"; members of the Chinese Communist Party who in the name of the Communist tradition and stability opposed market reforms as dangerous innovations (Deng 2012); those who criticized the use of "enhanced interrogation" (referred to by critics as torture) during the Bush administration's "War on Terror" as based upon a "truly innovative and quite radical view" (Lederman 2007) that "undermin[ed] the moral values and legal traditions on which America was founded" (McTigue & Merman 2006); and the following are liberals: defenders of Vichy France; Chinese communists who advocated market reforms (but not basic rights); advocates of the use of enhanced interrogation.…”
Section: Conclusion: Politics and Controversymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the authors' characterization, the following are conservatives: Andre Siegfried (1939), who defended the French Democratic Tradition by arguing that "for a hundred and fifty years the Revolution has served a basic line of demarcation in the domestic politics of France," and that its principles had to be "defended from a new enemy [i.e., Fascism] along a new battle front"; members of the Chinese Communist Party who in the name of the Communist tradition and stability opposed market reforms as dangerous innovations (Deng 2012); those who criticized the use of "enhanced interrogation" (referred to by critics as torture) during the Bush administration's "War on Terror" as based upon a "truly innovative and quite radical view" (Lederman 2007) that "undermin[ed] the moral values and legal traditions on which America was founded" (McTigue & Merman 2006); and the following are liberals: defenders of Vichy France; Chinese communists who advocated market reforms (but not basic rights); advocates of the use of enhanced interrogation.…”
Section: Conclusion: Politics and Controversymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raymond Leslie Buell, toReinhold Niebuhr, June 14, 1943; Raymond Leslie Buell, to Henry Pitney Van Dusen, December 8, 1943, both in the Raymond Leslie Buell Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Box 11, Folder 13.14 (Benda 1934;Thompson 1940;Siegfried 1939;Maritain 1939;Toynbee 1939). On Catholic thought, see(Moyn 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the authors' characterization, the following are conservatives: Andre Siegfried (1939), who defended the French Democratic Tradition by arguing that “for a hundred and fifty years the Revolution has served a basic line of demarcation in the domestic politics of France,” and that its principles had to be “defended from a new enemy [i.e., Fascism] along a new battle front”; members of the Chinese Communist Party who in the name of the Communist tradition and stability opposed market reforms as dangerous innovations (Deng 2012); those who criticized the use of “enhanced interrogation” (referred to by critics as torture) during the Bush administration's “War on Terror” as based upon a “truly innovative and quite radical view” (Lederman 2007) that “undermin[ed] the moral values and legal traditions on which America was founded” (McTigue & Merman 2006); and the following are liberals: defenders of Vichy France; Chinese communists who advocated market reforms (but not basic rights); advocates of the use of enhanced interrogation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%