1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf00253045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The free surface on a liquid between cylinders rotating at different speeds part II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the second-grade model is found to predict the normal stress differences, it does not properly respond to shear thinning or thickening due to its constant apparent shear viscosity. For this reason, some experiments may be well described by the fluids of grade three or four [2,4,11]. Keeping this fact in view, the aim of the present analysis is to venture further into the regime of fourth-grade fluids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although the second-grade model is found to predict the normal stress differences, it does not properly respond to shear thinning or thickening due to its constant apparent shear viscosity. For this reason, some experiments may be well described by the fluids of grade three or four [2,4,11]. Keeping this fact in view, the aim of the present analysis is to venture further into the regime of fourth-grade fluids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The theory of rod climbing with surface tension neglected was done by Kaye [3), Joseph and Fosdick [4], Hoffman and Gottenberg [5], and B6hme [6]. Joseph et al [7] were the first to use theory in experiments designed to measure f3. They showed that, to get the predicted shapes of the free surface to agree with measured ones, it is necessary to retain the effects of surface tension, as in (2.2).…”
Section: H(r A)= Ho(r) + H 2 (R)a 2 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that, to get the predicted shapes of the free surface to agree with measured ones, it is necessary to retain the effects of surface tension, as in (2.2). A very accurate approximate solution of (2.2) was derived by Joseph et al [7]. When evaluated at the rod this solution gives a)4+X 2+) (2.9)…”
Section: H(r A)= Ho(r) + H 2 (R)a 2 mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Joseph and R.L. Fosdick [64,65], by means of a formal series expansion in the angular velocity of the rod. However, we wish to emphasize that a rigorous proof of rod-climbing is an outstanding open question.…”
Section: Remark 211mentioning
confidence: 99%