2020
DOI: 10.1177/1468018120929773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The framing of IMF and World Bank in political reform debates: The role of political orientation and policy fields in the cases of Russia and Ukraine

Abstract: The article presents a content analysis of assessments of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank in parliamentary debates in Russia (1998–2008) and Ukraine (2010–2019) in order to understand the position of domestic actors in cases of conditionality-based international support. Russia and Ukraine offer the opportunity to compare periods with and without an active loan agreement with the IMF for domestic actors across the full political spectrum. In addition, the World Health Organization and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a continuation of this effort, the UN Secretary-General established a COVID-19 Response and Recovery Fund in 2020 “to respond to the pandemic and its impacts, including an unprecedented socioeconomic shock” (UN 2020b , p. 2). However, the international community and LDC governments have continuously relied on the private sector, multinational corporations and financial institutions (Pleines 2021 ) for financial support. This trend has increased the role of the market while LDC governments have remained unaccountable for the enduring crises of their public health and education sectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a continuation of this effort, the UN Secretary-General established a COVID-19 Response and Recovery Fund in 2020 “to respond to the pandemic and its impacts, including an unprecedented socioeconomic shock” (UN 2020b , p. 2). However, the international community and LDC governments have continuously relied on the private sector, multinational corporations and financial institutions (Pleines 2021 ) for financial support. This trend has increased the role of the market while LDC governments have remained unaccountable for the enduring crises of their public health and education sectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike WHO and UNESCO, the Bretton Woods Institutions were backed by market forces; they thus held monetary power, and came to fill the leadership vacuum. Instead of supporting national governments in controlling corruption and institutionalising democracy, the Bretton Woods Institutions approached the public health and education sectors of LDCs through the market mechanism (Pleines 2021 ). Governments of LDCs were asked to adopt market-friendly policies under so-called “structural adjustment programmes” (SAPs).…”
Section: The Origins Of Ldcs’ Public Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While deputies from liberal parties had a share of 10 percent in parliament, their share in IMF-related statements stood at only 2 percent. The representatives of the state executive, when appearing in parliament, mostly limited their arguments to the IMF as a source of financial support (Pleines 2021). As a result, many of the original reform plans were not fully implemented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The All-Russian Societies of the Blind and the Deaf were founded in the 1920s, and the All-Russian Society of the Disabled was created in the 1980s on the initiative and with significant support of the Soviet government. The All-Russian Societies position themselves in opposition to globalization and neoliberal trends, for example the economic and social standards promoted by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (Sharafutdinova and Dawisha 2017;Pleines 2021). Another reason for defining the All-Russian Societies ESSAY S as traditionalist is that these organizations resist competitive principles in social policy and practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%