2005
DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bch321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families--A Basis for a 'Therapeutic' Encounter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So we refer the angry or sad service user to the expert therapist or to another agency for a specialist service instead of attempting to engage him or her ourselves. This last point may place a different complexion on the point noted above about the disowning of the term 'therapeutic' in social work literature (Millar & Corby, 2006).…”
Section: Taking Risks In Learning About Theory and Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So we refer the angry or sad service user to the expert therapist or to another agency for a specialist service instead of attempting to engage him or her ourselves. This last point may place a different complexion on the point noted above about the disowning of the term 'therapeutic' in social work literature (Millar & Corby, 2006).…”
Section: Taking Risks In Learning About Theory and Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There is perhaps a residual view in some circles that it is oppressive to make use of psychotherapeutic knowledge and skills; as though by employing these ideas the worker necessarily forgets the impact on service users of wider social processes of discrimination and disadvantage. In a recent paper, Millar and Corby (2006) exemplify this position, apologising for their use of the term 'therapeutic' in the title of the paper investigating the impact of the Assessment Framework on the children and families surveyed:…”
Section: Policy Makers' Perspectives On Social Workers In Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been surprisingly little detailed research into the wider issue of how to test the efficacy and success of the post-refocussing approach. Millar and Corby ( 2006 ) note that: ‘To date, there has been a limited amount of research into social work with children and families since refocussing’. One reason for this may be the problems of evaluation caused by mixing the purpose of assessment.…”
Section: Areas Of Uncertainty For Evaluation In the ‘Dual Purpose Modmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One aim of ‘psy’ discourses from which the assessment framework originates is that some therapeutic value is possible, either as a result of the process and dialogue involved in assessment itself, or as a transaction that follows assessment. One of the few qualitative studies into the effect of assessment considered whether the Initial Assessment could have its own therapeutic value (Millar & Corby, 2006 ). The results raised an interesting point: perception of therapeutic value is only evident where the process is perceived as consensual.…”
Section: Areas Of Uncertainty For Evaluation In the ‘Dual Purpose Modmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To continue to do so, however, would be a mistake. Child care social workers should be proactive in making constructive use of new assessment frameworks (Millar and Corby, 2006). They also need to be proactive in Children Centre work and in the formulation of local plans for children and young people.…”
Section: The Impact On Child Care Social Workmentioning
confidence: 99%