The framework for factors affecting technology transfer for suppliers and buyers of technology in Korea

Assessment of Technology Transfer Office Performance for Value Creation in Higher Education Institutions

“…Study shows, significant influence of contract works on the performance of technology transfer offices, as well as the positive influence of international and national projects on the high performance and created value for universities, similar to Huyghe et al (2016), at the same time expanding network of university partners (Miller et al 2016;Carlsson, Fridh 2002;Fritsch, Schwirten 1999). Experts response reflect science-business actuality, so universities should maintain active strategy (Battaglia et al 2017;Fai et al 2017) and build strong relationships and attract more "customers" (Lee et al 2017) to university. While universities will have strong technology transfer office's staff, saturated market and absorptive capacity (Santoro, Bierly 2006), when industry will be ready for progress, then we can expect significant incomes from innovation industry to governmental budget.…”

“…Zhang and Gallagher (2016) pointed out four main drivers for technology transfer from the global innovation system to China: global market formation policy, international mobilization of talent, the flexibility of manufacturing in China, and belated policy incentives from China's government. Lee et al (2017) explored the technology transfer and established a comprehensive framework for the factors which influence on-time completion of technology transfer for suppliers and buyers according to technology transfer agreements.…”

“…The more closely industry and science will work (Etzkowitz, Leydesdorff 2000;Sherwood, Covin 2008), the more useful innovations will be developed by scientists. Globalization process, international partners (Zhang, Gallagher 2016;Lee et al 2017), international patenting and IP portfolio (Roberts 1999) could bring more revenue for university based on license or other commercialization way, what directly influence the technology transfer offices' performance results. Study shows, significant influence of contract works on the performance of technology transfer offices, as well as the positive influence of international and national projects on the high performance and created value for universities, similar to Huyghe et al (2016), at the same time expanding network of university partners (Miller et al 2016;Carlsson, Fridh 2002;Fritsch, Schwirten 1999).…”

Producción científica sobre el proceso de transferencia de conocimiento y tecnología en universidades: un análisis bibliométrico

“…Los artículos de este grupo abarcan el estudio de factores de éxito de la tecnología desde el punto de vista del proveedor (fuente del desarrollo tecnológico), reconociendo que la tecnología, organización, contexto, colaboración y factores de capacidad de absorción del cliente son los determinantes que permiten una adecuada transferencia (Chiș & Crișan, 2020). También, se explora un marco de referencia de la transferencia para equipos de tecnología de la información relacionado con la finalización a tiempo de la transferencia, según los acuerdos establecidos entre el proveedor y comprador (Lee et al, 2018). Otro de los artículos evalúa la competitividad, analizando el insatisfactorio sistema de intercambio de tecnología entre los actores del proceso de innovación, ampliando la brecha cada vez mayor entre ciencia y su aplicación, la cual reduce la competitividad empresarial y desarrollo de los países (Kuzmanova, 2020).…”

Technology Commercialization through Sustainable Knowledge Sharing from University-Industry Collaborations, with a Focus on Patent Propensity

“…Absorbing new knowledge and technology from universities as well as maximizing their capacity to use that knowledge for performance gains is critical for a firm's survival through the utilization of open innovation [9][10][11]. Not surprisingly, university activities such as technology transfer and commercialization have received much attention in the literature in recent years [12][13][14][15]. It is firms, rather than universities, which act as the main entities for commercializing innovations.…”