2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3089117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Frailties of Maps as Evidence in International Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…41 But barring a singular footnote to Chester's scholarship, the conditions prevalent during the making of these maps were not on the minds of the arbitrators when the maps were considered as evidence of international territorial boundaries. 42 Indeed, the governments presented the maps in two vastly different fashions, each claiming that its version was "authentic" and closer to contemporary reality. The Radcliffe sketch, uninterested as it was with maritime boundaries, nevertheless became central to the delimitation process at The Hague.…”
Section: Fixed: the Radcliffe Sketch And The Ramnad Zamindarimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 But barring a singular footnote to Chester's scholarship, the conditions prevalent during the making of these maps were not on the minds of the arbitrators when the maps were considered as evidence of international territorial boundaries. 42 Indeed, the governments presented the maps in two vastly different fashions, each claiming that its version was "authentic" and closer to contemporary reality. The Radcliffe sketch, uninterested as it was with maritime boundaries, nevertheless became central to the delimitation process at The Hague.…”
Section: Fixed: the Radcliffe Sketch And The Ramnad Zamindarimentioning
confidence: 99%