1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00403293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fourth International Serum Exchange Workshop to standardize cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies

Abstract: Report prepared by ~. Lernmark 1, J. L. Molenaar 2, W. A. M. van Beers 2' Y. Yamaguchi3; S. Nagataki 3' J. Ludvigsson 4 and N. K. Maclaren s on behalf of the Immunology and Diabetes Workshops and participating laboratories*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antibody positive and negative samples were included in every assay to correct for inter-assay variation. The JDF ICA standard [34,35], which is also GAD65 antibody positive as verified by immunoprecipitation [2][3][4]12] was used as the GAD65 antibody positive standard. One of the 105 IDDM patients was found to be GAD67 antibody positive as verified by immunoprecipitation [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibody positive and negative samples were included in every assay to correct for inter-assay variation. The JDF ICA standard [34,35], which is also GAD65 antibody positive as verified by immunoprecipitation [2][3][4]12] was used as the GAD65 antibody positive standard. One of the 105 IDDM patients was found to be GAD67 antibody positive as verified by immunoprecipitation [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assays of islet-cell antibodies (ICA), insulin autoantibodies (IAA), anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA) and anti-insulinoma-associated antigen-2 antibodies (IA-2A) are described in detail in a recent paper by Kukko et al [12]. The disease sensitivity of the ICA assay was 100% and the specificity 98% in the Fourth Immunology and Diabetes Workshop for the Standardisation of Cytoplasmic ICA [13]. The disease sensitivity of the IAA assay was 44% and the specificity 98% in the 2002 Diabetes Autoantibody Standardisation Programme (DASP) Workshop.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The levels of 1CA were analysed semiquantitatively using a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = negative, 1 = weakly positive, 2 = positive, 3 = strongly positive). End-point dilution titres were examined in samples from 86 diabetic children and were expressed in Juvenile Diabetes Foundation (JDF) units relative to an international reference standard [18]. Of the diabetic children 79 %, of the sibling-control children 5 % and of the population-control children 0 % were positive for ICA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%