Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2001
DOI: 10.1086/323112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Four‐Quadrant Phase‐Mask Coronagraph. II. Simulations

Abstract: In the first paper in this series, we described the principle of a coronagraph utilizing a fourquadrant phase mask and the results of numerical simulations obtained in the perfect case. In this second paper, we performed additional numerical simulations to assess in more detail the performances and limitations of this coronagraph under real conditions. The effect of geometrical parameters such as shape and size of both the phase mask and the Lyot stop is studied. We also analyze the effect of low-and high-orde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The FQPM can take advantage of this welcoming effect with a centrosymmetrical subtraction and yield a higher S/N than others coronagraphs. On the contrary, the AIC cannot benefit from the speckle symmetry and gives a S/N lower than that of the FQPM (if the latter is made achromatic; see Riaud et al 2001) since the variance of the wave front is increased by a factor 2. However, a real telescope pupil is provided with a central obscuration, and in that case the AIC outperforms the Lyot as well as the FQPM since it can be fitted into any centrosymmetrical aperture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The FQPM can take advantage of this welcoming effect with a centrosymmetrical subtraction and yield a higher S/N than others coronagraphs. On the contrary, the AIC cannot benefit from the speckle symmetry and gives a S/N lower than that of the FQPM (if the latter is made achromatic; see Riaud et al 2001) since the variance of the wave front is increased by a factor 2. However, a real telescope pupil is provided with a central obscuration, and in that case the AIC outperforms the Lyot as well as the FQPM since it can be fitted into any centrosymmetrical aperture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Riaud et al (2001), the achievable detection threshold of the FQPM is now only 14 mag (the star is no longer totally attenuated). In such a case, and even with very low phase defects, the diffraction term is no longer negligible regarding the speckle term.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, at least one recent coronagraphic approach is ideally suited to an unvignetted, off-axis telescope configuration -the four-quadrant phase-mask (FQPM) coronagraph (Rouan it et al 2000, Boccaletti et al 2004), which introduces phase shifts of π radians in two diametrically opposed quadrants of the focal plane ( is no opaque starlight blocker in the FQPM approach (the star sits at the crosshairs of the phase plate), this approach is suited to observations very close to the optical axis (Riaud et al 2001). However, the performance of a FQPM coronagraph is degraded by the presence of an on-axis secondary mirror (Lloyd et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%