2016
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2016)053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The four-loop six-gluon NMHV ratio function

Abstract: Abstract:We use the hexagon function bootstrap to compute the ratio function which characterizes the next-to-maximally-helicity-violating (NMHV) six-point amplitude in planar N = 4 super-Yang-Mills theory at four loops. A powerful constraint comes from dual superconformal invariance, in the form of aQ differential equation, which heavily constrains the first derivatives of the transcendental functions entering the ratio function. At four loops, it leaves only a 34-parameter space of functions. Constraints from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
222
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 174 publications
3
222
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See [39,40] for applications of such a bootstrap approach to six-point amplitudes in N = 4 SYM. In the latter theory, the kinematic dependence of the c i is related, at least conjecturally, to leading singularities [41], simplifying the above ansatz.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [39,40] for applications of such a bootstrap approach to six-point amplitudes in N = 4 SYM. In the latter theory, the kinematic dependence of the c i is related, at least conjecturally, to leading singularities [41], simplifying the above ansatz.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[93]). At weak coupling, it was found to simplify the six-point multi-particle factorization limit [11], self-crossing limit [73] and NMHVQ relations [35], before its role in applying the six-point Steinmann relations was noticed [15]. We will see its advantages as well in our seven-point analysis.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Starting at six points, the BDS ansatz receives corrections from finite functions of dual conformal invariants [25,26,28,29]. The correction to the maximally helicity violating (MHV) amplitude has traditionally been expressed in terms of a (BDS) remainder function [10,12,25,26,30], while the correction to the next-to-maximally helicity violating (NMHV) amplitude has traditionally been expressed in terms of the infrared-finite NMHV ratio function [11,[31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Jhep02(2017)137mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A leading-order strong-coupling analysis is also possible [37,38], but even more remarkably, the building blocks in question can also be obtained to all loops [39] by means of analytic continuation from a collinear limit where the dynamics is governed by an integrable flux tube [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51], see also [52][53][54]. These developments render the MRK as one of the best sources of 'boundary data' [54][55][56][57] for determining the six-gluon amplitude in general kinematics through five loops, by exploiting its analytic structure with the help of the bootstrap method [30,[58][59][60][61][62].…”
Section: Jhep06(2018)116mentioning
confidence: 99%