1979
DOI: 10.1093/erae/6.1.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The formulation of MOTAD programming models for farm planning using subjectively elicited activity net revenue distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hazell (1971) inferred that the MOTAD model, as a linearized version of Quadratic Programming (QP), is better adapted for the post-optimality analysis, and MOTAD may lead to much smaller problems for complex farm organizations. The MOTAD linear approximation of the QP and combinations obtained with MOTAD are an acceptable proxy for the Expected-Variance (E-V) combinations obtained from quadratic function (Hardaker and Troncoso, 1979;Lambert and McCarl, 1985;Önal and McCarl, 1989).…”
Section: Methods For Generating Optimum Capacity Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hazell (1971) inferred that the MOTAD model, as a linearized version of Quadratic Programming (QP), is better adapted for the post-optimality analysis, and MOTAD may lead to much smaller problems for complex farm organizations. The MOTAD linear approximation of the QP and combinations obtained with MOTAD are an acceptable proxy for the Expected-Variance (E-V) combinations obtained from quadratic function (Hardaker and Troncoso, 1979;Lambert and McCarl, 1985;Önal and McCarl, 1989).…”
Section: Methods For Generating Optimum Capacity Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() describe as embedded risk programming. Hardaker and Troncoso () brought EU theory to bear on linear risk programming, as did Kennedy et al . () to dynamic programming.…”
Section: Stochastic Programming and Simulation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the usefulness of linear programming could be questioned due to its assumptions, namely linearity, additivity, and convexity, empirical findings, for example Johnson (1966), suggest that the restrictiveness of these assumptions would not be significant, especially in the context of agricultural land use decisions. Hence linear programming has found widespread application in agriculture; for example Hardaker and Troncoso (1979), Hazell and Norton (1986), and McCamley and Kliebenstein (1987).…”
Section: The Nature Of the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%