2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1221-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Forms and Limits of Insurance Solidarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fundamentally, successful adaptation hinges on our capacity to work together as a society, and dependence on individualized insurance limits that capacity. Lehtonen and Liukko (2011) argue that aspects of solidarity and mutual dependency also exist within the private insurance industry, but have become hidden as the sector has become increasingly complex and technologized. While examples such as Takaful, or solidarity funds offer alternative models for insurance and climate adaptation, the proactive approach to climate change being taken by insurers in western democracies including the US, UK, and Australia is placing the insurance sector front and center, while governments step back through individual responsibilization agendas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamentally, successful adaptation hinges on our capacity to work together as a society, and dependence on individualized insurance limits that capacity. Lehtonen and Liukko (2011) argue that aspects of solidarity and mutual dependency also exist within the private insurance industry, but have become hidden as the sector has become increasingly complex and technologized. While examples such as Takaful, or solidarity funds offer alternative models for insurance and climate adaptation, the proactive approach to climate change being taken by insurers in western democracies including the US, UK, and Australia is placing the insurance sector front and center, while governments step back through individual responsibilization agendas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While retaining some key intuitions and formulations by Thiery and Van Schoubroeck (2006) and our own earlier paper (Lehtonen and Liukko 2011), but modifying their terms, we arrive at a tripartite distinction between fundamental forms of insurance solidarity.…”
Section: Risk Solidarity and Income Solidaritymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(Thiery and Van Schoubroeck 2006: 196) As we have noted in an earlier text, subsidizing solidarity comes in two distinct forms. These are subsidizing risk solidarity and subsidizing income solidarity (Lehtonen and Liukko 2011). The first of these is defined in the following way: '[…] the less the risks and fees correspond, the more subsidizing there is that is favourable to those with high risk' (Lehtonen and Liukko 2011, p. 39).…”
Section: Risk Solidarity and Income Solidaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second idea is to pay attention to how insurance frames social, economic or power relations (Lehtonen and Jyri 2011). There is an evident link between this conception and Foucault's theoretical framework, exemplified in the work of François Ewald (1986Ewald ( , 1996.…”
Section: A Political Philosophy Of Public Insurancementioning
confidence: 99%