2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The formation of Proval Bay as an episode in the development of the Baikal rift basin: A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Baikal basin, tectonically driven earthquakes induce subsidence on the delta topset with a recurrence time of 350-500 yr and with an average of ~3 m of vertical (downward) movement per event (Shchetnikov et al, 2012). This magnitude and frequency produce subsidence rates of 6-8 mm/yr over time scales of centuries to millennia (Vologina et al, 2010), and this is a minimum estimate of subsidence rate because it does not consider sediment compaction.…”
Section: Paradox Of Arrested Gravel Frontmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Baikal basin, tectonically driven earthquakes induce subsidence on the delta topset with a recurrence time of 350-500 yr and with an average of ~3 m of vertical (downward) movement per event (Shchetnikov et al, 2012). This magnitude and frequency produce subsidence rates of 6-8 mm/yr over time scales of centuries to millennia (Vologina et al, 2010), and this is a minimum estimate of subsidence rate because it does not consider sediment compaction.…”
Section: Paradox Of Arrested Gravel Frontmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the preservation potential of fluvialdeltaic stratigraphy is closely related to tectonically driven subsidence, and this interplay may be evaluated by the ratio of channel to tectonic time scales (Kim et al, 2010;Straub et al, 2013). In essence, if the tectonically induced subsidence rate is faster than the channel reworking rate on the delta topset, it is possible to imprint a significant fraction of the subaerial deltaic landscape into the subsurface stratigraphy, because tectonic events lower portions of the delta topset below the active reworking depth of the laterally sweeping distributary channels (Kim et al, 2010;Shchetnikov et al, 2012). As a result, in a tectonically dominated system, the morphological processes of the delta topset play a key role in constructing basin stratigraphy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strongest seismic event known in the study area is the January 12, 1862, M 7.5 Tsagan earthquake (Kondorskaya and Shebalin 1982 ; Golenetskii 1996 ). This earthquake was accompanied by seismogenic subsidence of a tectonic block with an area of more than 200 km 2 and the formation of Proval Bay in the northeastern part of the Selenga delta (Golenetskii 1996 ), which, in turn, can be considered as a separate episode in the evolution of the Baikal basin (Shchetnikov et al 2012 ). Macroseismic effects of the Tsagan earthquake were observed over a vast area; the epicentral intensity is IX–X MSK-64 (Golenetskii 1996 ).…”
Section: Tectonic Settings and Seismicity Of Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, it is important that the area of the Selenga River delta is considered a center of the formation and development of the Baikal rift zone [Logachev, 2003]. We also note that strong seismic events similar to the Tsagan earthquake (M=7.5) should be considered as separate key episodes of the development of the Baikal basin [Shchetnikov et al, 2012].…”
Section: S E Le N G Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its estimated magnitude M was 7.5, and the shaking intensity at the epi center area reached degree X (MSK-64 scale) [Kondorskaya, Shebalin, 1982;Golenetskii, 1996]. This earthquake caused the subsidence of a tectonic block and the sinking of almost 5 m of a land area of more than 200 km 2 into Lake Baikal [Sgibnev, 1864;Shchetnikov et al, 2012]. Consequently, sedimentation conditions in a significant part of the Selenga delta were drastically changed.…”
Section: Traces Of Historical Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%