2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2021.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The formation of iron oxides and magnetic enhancement mechanisms in northern Iranian loess-paleosol sequences: Evidence from diffuse reflectance spectrophotometry and temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, by comparing loess units at Mobarakabad, including the OSL ages of unit 4, with stratigraphy and previously published luminescence ages from other sections at NFAM, this unit 1 at Mobarakabad correlates well with MIS 5e (Particle Size Parameters of Loess Units). Corroborating this assignment, based on magnetic depletion in the paleosol of unit 1 at Mobarakabad, Ghafarpour et al (2021) concluded that the paleosol formation was accompanied by high (winter) rainfall in which dissolution of pedogenic maghemite-magnetite occurred. As such, one way of explaining these observations is high rainfall in winters, probably in MIS 5e, followed by dry and hot summers in which evaporative soil water loss predominates with little meteoric recharge, resulting in enriched δ 18 O bc and δ 18 O pc values of the upper horizons (Btb and Btkb) compared to those of Bkb and BCb horizons in unit 1 (Figure 2A).…”
Section: Particle Size Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, by comparing loess units at Mobarakabad, including the OSL ages of unit 4, with stratigraphy and previously published luminescence ages from other sections at NFAM, this unit 1 at Mobarakabad correlates well with MIS 5e (Particle Size Parameters of Loess Units). Corroborating this assignment, based on magnetic depletion in the paleosol of unit 1 at Mobarakabad, Ghafarpour et al (2021) concluded that the paleosol formation was accompanied by high (winter) rainfall in which dissolution of pedogenic maghemite-magnetite occurred. As such, one way of explaining these observations is high rainfall in winters, probably in MIS 5e, followed by dry and hot summers in which evaporative soil water loss predominates with little meteoric recharge, resulting in enriched δ 18 O bc and δ 18 O pc values of the upper horizons (Btb and Btkb) compared to those of Bkb and BCb horizons in unit 1 (Figure 2A).…”
Section: Particle Size Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These deposits represent outstanding archives of past climate in a region highly sensitive to changes in hydroclimate and potentially important in past human migrations (Shoaee et al, 2021) but otherwise poorly represented by past climate records. The loess units in the area are separated by paleosols showing various development degrees, providing valuable sedimentary archives of loess accumulation, soil, and paleosol formation within the loess units (Kehl et al, 2005;Frechen et al, 2009;Kehl, 2010;Khormali and Kehl, 2011;Ghafarpour et al, 2016Ghafarpour et al, , 2021Vlaminck et al, 2016Vlaminck et al, , 2018Lauer et al, 2017a;Lauer et al, 2017b;Shahriari et al, 2017;Pourmasoumi et al, 2019;Sharifigarmdareh et al, 2020;Kehl et al, 2021). These previous studies of loess-paleosol sequences in northern Iran mainly focused on dating of the deposits, particle size distributions, and paleosol formation in response to paleoprecipitation and paleopedogenic process, with little emphasis on phases of eolian deposition, meaning that additional detailed analyses of the loess units in particular are essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). Therefore, compared with χ lf and χ fd %, the a* value might be a more reliable paleoclimatic indicator (Hu et al, 2014) in the loess–paleosol sequences of the NILP and NFAM (Ghafarpour et al, 2021a). We also ascribe the increased hematite content and χ fd % values in the modern soil and paleosols (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). These loess deposits are separated by buried soils that formed under relatively moist and warm climatic conditions (e.g., Frechen et al, 2009; Kehl, 2010; Karimi et al, 2011; Lauer et al, 2017b; Ghafarpour et al, 2021a; Kehl et al, 2021). Regressions and transgressions of the Caspian Sea (e.g., Yanina, 2014; Yanina et al, 2018; Krijgsman et al, 2019; Leroy et al, 2020) may have affected loess formation in the Caspian Lowlands by changing the size of the dust source area and by their influence on regional climate (Vlaminck et al, 2018; Kehl et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rock magnetism (magnetic properties of rocks) and palaeomagnetic (magnetostratigraphy) methods, especially in combination with lithological-palaeopedological and palynological analyses, serve as a powerful tool in the reconstruction of palaeoenvironmental changes [120][121][122]. Magnetic susceptibility is a sensitive, fast and accurate technique to detect soil pedogenic processes and features and can improve the understanding of soil-forming and, correspondingly, palaeoclimate factors [86,[123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%