2016
DOI: 10.1111/acer.13213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Formation, Elimination, Interpretation, and Future Research Needs of Phosphatidylethanol for Research Studies and Clinical Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent meta-analysis reported a mean level around 2,400 ng/mL, much higher than our cohort’s median level around 900 ng/mL (Viel et al, 2012). Other factors regulating the synthesis and elimination of PEth may further contribute to variance among individuals (Hahn 2016). Our application is unique among these published investigations in that values were measured in critically ill patients, and were reflective of alcohol misuse according to AUDIT scores obtained in parallel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent meta-analysis reported a mean level around 2,400 ng/mL, much higher than our cohort’s median level around 900 ng/mL (Viel et al, 2012). Other factors regulating the synthesis and elimination of PEth may further contribute to variance among individuals (Hahn 2016). Our application is unique among these published investigations in that values were measured in critically ill patients, and were reflective of alcohol misuse according to AUDIT scores obtained in parallel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AUDIT-C, an abbreviated tool, consists of the first three full AUDIT questions quantifying alcohol consumption, and has been shown to have good test characteristics for assessing alcohol misuse in acutely ill patients (Reisinger et al, 2015). The AUDIT-C was used as another reference in this investigation to address only the questions around quantification of alcohol consumption (Hahn et al, 2016). AUDIT-C scores of ≥3 and ≥4 were used for females and males, respectively, for the lower risk limit of any misuse, while scores of ≥6 and ≥8 were used to define severe misuse (Reisinger et al, 2015, Rubinsky et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing PEth-positive after denying alcohol use on the baseline research interview was less common (13.1%); this may be because the participants had consented to have a breathalyzer test and blood biomarker testing to detect alcohol use, and were ensured confidentiality in the research protocol. Another study in this setting found increased self-reports after consent for alcohol biomarker testing (Hahn, et al, 2012) and other research studies found PEth-confirmed under-reporting (Bajunirwe, et al, 2014; Hahn et al, 2016). While under-reporting in any setting may be due to social desirability and recall bias, the increased level of under-reporting to clinic counselors suggests that patients may fear being denied ART (Papas et al, 2012) or some other consequence if they report drinking alcohol at the clinic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…PEth is not 100% sensitive for detecting any alcohol use (Hahn, Anton, et al, 2016) so we might have missed a few under-reporters. Lastly, the study had modest sample size, which may have reduced the power to detect statistically significant differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation