2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The formation and evolution of physician treatment styles: An application to cesarean sections

Abstract: Small-area-variation studies have shown that physician treatment styles differ substantially both between and within markets, controlling for patient characteristics. Using data on the universe of deliveries in Florida and New York over a 15-year period, we examine why treatment styles differ across obstetricians at a point in time and why styles change over time. We find that variation in c-section rates across physicians within a market is about twice as large as variation between markets. Surprisingly, resi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

11
104
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
11
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While a physician’s network is known to influence how they practice (Coleman et al, 1957; Soumerai et al, 1998; Epstein and Nicholson, 2009; Lucas et al, 2010), the rank of a physician’s initial medical school is one aspect of a physician’s network that has received surprisingly little attention. A notable exception is Doyle et al (2010), who demonstrate that patients randomly assigned to a doctor who attended a higher ranked medical school have less expensive stays but no difference in health outcomes compared to patients who instead see physicians from a lower ranked program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a physician’s network is known to influence how they practice (Coleman et al, 1957; Soumerai et al, 1998; Epstein and Nicholson, 2009; Lucas et al, 2010), the rank of a physician’s initial medical school is one aspect of a physician’s network that has received surprisingly little attention. A notable exception is Doyle et al (2010), who demonstrate that patients randomly assigned to a doctor who attended a higher ranked medical school have less expensive stays but no difference in health outcomes compared to patients who instead see physicians from a lower ranked program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Epstein and Nicholson (2009) and Dranove, Ramanarayanan, and Sfekas (2011) investigate the prevalence of spillovers in the case of C-sections, and neither find much evidence for them: there is no convergence in practice styles among physicians in the same hospitals over time. Similarly, Chan (2015) looks at how doctors’ practice style develops early in their careers and finds that the practice styles of attending physicians have little impact on those junior to them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, physician-specific factors such as preferences, training, and experience may cause physicians to treat patients differently even under similar environments. Consistent with this possibility, physicians practicing in the same local health care market often exhibit large and persistent “style” differences in their tendency to prescribe certain treatments and utilize medical resources (Phelps 2000, Grytten and Sørensen 2003, and Epstein and Nicholson 2009). These styles exist even when physicians have access to the same hospital facilities and ancillary staff and when the patients are randomized to physician teams (Doyle, Ewer, and Wagner 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%