1957
DOI: 10.1147/rd.14.0341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Formalization of Scientific Languages—Part I: The Work of Woodger and Hull

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1963
1963
1966
1966

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computer models, in fact, seem superior, in important respects, to our traditional models. First of all, they have been specified precisely-this is not at all trivial; recent attempts to put such theories as Hebb's and Hull's into precise, testable form have met with major difficulties (Dunham, 1957, Rochester, Holland, Haibt, & Duda, 1956. Second, they have actually been examined for their consequences (through the running of the program) and tested as to their success.…”
Section: Computer Programs As Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computer models, in fact, seem superior, in important respects, to our traditional models. First of all, they have been specified precisely-this is not at all trivial; recent attempts to put such theories as Hebb's and Hull's into precise, testable form have met with major difficulties (Dunham, 1957, Rochester, Holland, Haibt, & Duda, 1956. Second, they have actually been examined for their consequences (through the running of the program) and tested as to their success.…”
Section: Computer Programs As Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%