1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1995.tb00543.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The form and function of challenging behaviours

Abstract: Aspects of the topography and behavioural function underlying the challenging behaviours of all people with learning disabilities and challenging behaviour (n = 70) in a defined geographical area were investigated. Results indicated that: (1) more severe challenging behaviours were shown by people with more severe disabilities; (2) a significant minority (44%) of people showed more than one form of challenging behaviour, this rising to 79% among people with more severe challenging behaviours; and (3) cross-sec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
74
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, it was found that disruptive and antisocial behaviours, as measured by the Developmental Behaviour Checklist (Einfeld & Tonge, 1992), were more prominent in the group with mild intellectua l disability ; whereas, self-absorbed and autistic behaviours were more frequently found in those children with a severe level of intellectual disability . These latter findings coincide with those of Emerson and Bromley (1995) who also suggested that severe challenging behaviours were shown by people with more severe disability , with a significant number (44%) of people showing more than one form of challenging behaviour.…”
Section: Prevalence and Aetiology Of Challenging Behavioursupporting
confidence: 87%
“…More specifically, it was found that disruptive and antisocial behaviours, as measured by the Developmental Behaviour Checklist (Einfeld & Tonge, 1992), were more prominent in the group with mild intellectua l disability ; whereas, self-absorbed and autistic behaviours were more frequently found in those children with a severe level of intellectual disability . These latter findings coincide with those of Emerson and Bromley (1995) who also suggested that severe challenging behaviours were shown by people with more severe disability , with a significant number (44%) of people showing more than one form of challenging behaviour.…”
Section: Prevalence and Aetiology Of Challenging Behavioursupporting
confidence: 87%
“…2 3 The lower the IQ greater the prevalence of challenging behaviour, approaching 40% 4 in those with severe learning disability. Emerson 5 defined challenging behaviour as:…”
Section: Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Behaviour disturbances can further be caused by major emotional universal needs in learning disabled people (for example security, friendship) being unmet.…”
Section: Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor to be considered in ID is the presence of behavioral disorders, recognizable in 25 to 60% of adults with ID residing in the community; although this percentage decreases to 12 to 17% when involving severe behavioral irregularities. 34,35 A behavioral disorder is a set of disruptive of negative behaviors of such intensity, frequency and duration that it can put the physical security of the person or of others in danger, or that may limit or delay the delivery of ordinary community resources. 36 The principal behavioral problems associated with ID, according to the expanded inventory (Inventory for Client and Agency Planning, ICAP), 37 are the following: self-injurious behavior, aggressiveness toward or injuring others, destruction of objects, disruptive behavior, atypical and repetitive habits (stereotypical), offensive social conduct, timidity or lack of attention and cooperation.…”
Section: Psychiatric and Behavioral Disorders Associated With Intellementioning
confidence: 99%