The Forgotten Survivor: The Articulated Needs of Survivors of Psychological and Economic Abuse Who Stay

Abstract

Despite improvements, extant research and praxis has not yet given sufficient attention to nonphysical forms of intimate partner violence, including psychological and economic abuse. Furthermore, interventions for survivors (from clinicians, helpline workers, and other types of domestic violence advocates) are heavily geared toward needs associated with leaving an abusive relationship. Therefore, victims of nonphysical abuse who intend to stay in the relationship are tending to be overlooked. Based on in-depth interviews with 20 women who were experiencing psychological and economic abuse and intended to stay in the relationship, this study identified six unmet needs among that population: (1) to identify the causes of the current abusive situation; (2) to understand the effects of abuse; (3) to de-escalate hostility and talk through issues calmly and without blame, judgment, or accusation; (4) to explain to a social support team the decision to remain in the relationship; (5) to develop an individualized plan of action to address the abuse; and (6) to share advice with others in similar situations. Based on these needs, recommendations for future scholarship and praxis are offered.

Efficacy of Psychosocial Interventions for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

“…Psychotherapy has become crucial as a clinical treatment measure for survivors suffering from the psychological consequences of IPV (Hameed et al, 2020). Integrative interventions, sometimes referred to as multi-component interventions, combine both approaches (Eckhardt et al, 2013; Rivas et al, 2019; Sabri & Gielen, 2019) and aim to fulfill the diverse safety-related, legal, and psychosocial needs of IPV survivors (Crump, 2020; Ferranti et al, 2018). Beyond their theoretical approach, the psychosocial interventions vary in their delivery modes (i.e., face-to-face [individually, for couples, or in groups], remote [via telephone or video calls], and online [through internet, mobile-based platforms, and applications]), treatment intensity (i.e., one time up to multiple sessions) and intervention setting (i.e., in healthcare, shelter, or community settings) (Rivas et al, 2019; Trabold et al, 2020).…”