1989
DOI: 10.1080/03637758909390266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The forest ranger revisited: A study of control practices and identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of organizational identification was well recognized because it is positively related to individual performance (Benkhoff 1997;van Knippenberg 2000), job involvement, job satisfaction (van Knippenberg and van Schie 2000), and organizational citizenship behavior including decisions and actions that are consistent with a mission of an organization (Cheney 1983;Bullis and Tompkins 1989;Mael and Ashforth 1992;Ferraris, Carveth and Parrish-Sprowl 1993). In contrast, organizational identification is negatively related to turnover intention and actual turnover (Kreiner and Ashforth 2004).…”
Section: Organizational Identificationmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The significance of organizational identification was well recognized because it is positively related to individual performance (Benkhoff 1997;van Knippenberg 2000), job involvement, job satisfaction (van Knippenberg and van Schie 2000), and organizational citizenship behavior including decisions and actions that are consistent with a mission of an organization (Cheney 1983;Bullis and Tompkins 1989;Mael and Ashforth 1992;Ferraris, Carveth and Parrish-Sprowl 1993). In contrast, organizational identification is negatively related to turnover intention and actual turnover (Kreiner and Ashforth 2004).…”
Section: Organizational Identificationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As identification has a natural connection with collective outcomes (Ashforth et al 2008), employees who identify with their organization are more likely to accept the organization's mission and goals (Tompkins and Cheney 1985;Bullis and The International Journal of Human Resource Management 1117…”
Section: Subsidiary Identification and Adaptation To Assignmentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Communication begins with the socialization process, where new members interact with more experienced members and leaders and in this way learn how primary goals are defined within the organization's dominant culture (i.e., the leadership). As members continue to interact, they are exposed to various normative influences that reinforce this definition, even after the socialization process ends (Bullis & Tompkins, 1989;Tompkins & Cheney, 1985). Collective action researchers describe a similar process for new volunteers, who learn about the leadership's primary goals within the context of small group meetings (Downton & Wehr, 1990;Klandermans, 1988;Knoke, 1990;Knoke & Wisely, 1990).…”
Section: Communication and Goal Consensusmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…• Programs can, will and should be allowed to be affected by an organization's culture; a pure (original) design rarely reflects what is best for the organization (Bullis & Tompkins, 1989). …”
Section: Organizational Culture: Cultural Influences Model (Cim)mentioning
confidence: 99%