2014
DOI: 10.1097/sap.0b013e3182a6ad21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Forehead Flap for Immediate Reconstruction of the Nose After Bite Injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding infection risk, studies show no significant difference between infection rates after PC or secondary intention [1]. The robust blood supply to the face enables PC without an increased infection rate [9,13]. The wound should be thoroughly cleansed and rinsed with povidone-iodine solution to lower the risk of infection [2,5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding infection risk, studies show no significant difference between infection rates after PC or secondary intention [1]. The robust blood supply to the face enables PC without an increased infection rate [9,13]. The wound should be thoroughly cleansed and rinsed with povidone-iodine solution to lower the risk of infection [2,5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In rare cases of highly contaminated wounds, doctors should consider healing by secondary intention, which also necessitates antimicrobial therapy and aggressive wound care [5]. The obvious disadvantage of secondary intention is the potentially unsatisfactory aesthetic outcome [13,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forehead flap still remains the gold standard in nasal reconstruction and its advantages are well known . Its main drawbacks consist of the resulting unfavorable forehead scar and the need for a second donor site in case of cartilage and/or bone defects . Bone resorption of non‐vascularized grafts may also lead to secondary deformities and collapse, especially when postoperative irradiation is necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] Its main drawbacks consist of the resulting unfavorable forehead scar and the need for a second donor site in case of cartilage and/or bone defects. 9,10 Bone resorption of nonvascularized grafts may also lead to secondary deformities and collapse, especially when postoperative irradiation is necessary. Free flap options like radial forearm flap (osteocutaneous or prefabricated) and prefabricated temporo-parietal fascia flap have been described with mixed results, with donor site morbidity and suboptimal aesthetic outcomes being the main issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shipkov et al maintain that the forehead flap is indicated for total or near-total nasal avulsion injuries, large through-and-through defects that cannot be closed by other methods and in large nontransfixiant defects where no other flap is applicable or that cannot be skin grafted. 19 Huang and Wong have also described the feasibility of immediate nasal reconstruction with a forehead flap after animal bite injuries (►Figs. 3 and 4).…”
Section: Local Flapsmentioning
confidence: 99%