2014
DOI: 10.21314/jem.2014.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The forecasting power of medium-term futures contracts

Abstract: This study investigates whether weekly futures prices, covering the time period 1996-2013, are

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work is revisited by Weron and Zator (2014), who evidence the positive impact of water reservoir seasonal levels on the risk premium. Haugom et al (2014) study the weekly futures traded on the Nordic power market, where they find a positive risk premium that varies across the seasons and tends to diminish over time; they do not, however, reject the unbiased forward hypothesis. These results are in line with those of Haugom and Ullrich (2012) for the day-ahead futures traded on the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland (PJM) market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This work is revisited by Weron and Zator (2014), who evidence the positive impact of water reservoir seasonal levels on the risk premium. Haugom et al (2014) study the weekly futures traded on the Nordic power market, where they find a positive risk premium that varies across the seasons and tends to diminish over time; they do not, however, reject the unbiased forward hypothesis. These results are in line with those of Haugom and Ullrich (2012) for the day-ahead futures traded on the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland (PJM) market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In particular, for shorter maturities (i.e., 1 week) risk premiums are typically positive on average, whereas for longer maturities (i.e., 6 weeks) they are negative. Bierbrauer et al () and Haugom et al () obtain similar results for medium‐term futures contracts examining prices from the EEX and Nord Pool markets, respectively. A reasonable explanation for negative risk premiums (i.e., contango markets) in electricity futures prices is a higher incentive for hedging on the demand side relative to the supply side, because of the non‐storability of electricity as compared to the limited and costly but still existent storage capabilities of fuel (water, coal, oil, and gas).…”
Section: Emission Allowances and The Convenience Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consensus on whether it is most appropriate to define the forward premium logarithmically or as a percentage. Haugom et al [17] argued that the logarithmic forward premium is most suited for OLS regression purposes. The logarithmic definition was used by Botterud et al [3], Haugom et al [17] and Haugom et al [18], whereas the percentage definition of the forward premium was used by Daskalakis and Markellos [16] and Longstaff and Wang [7].…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%