2005
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-1126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Force Required to Induce Hemivein Pulsation Is Associated with the Site of Maximum Field Loss in Glaucoma

Abstract: These venous pulsation findings in glaucoma are independent of blood pressure. The hemifield and hemivein association suggests that the major hemivein change is adjacent to the site of major disc damage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, improved SVP monitoring could benefit subjects requiring regular or long term ICP monitoring. 7 Various associations have also been reported between SVP and glaucoma: (1) venous pulsation evoked by ophthalmodynamometry indicates higher venous pressure in glaucoma subjects, [8][9][10] (2) SVP incidence is lower in glaucoma, [11][12][13][14] (3) SVP is related to the severity of functional damage, 11,13,15,16 and (4) SVP is predictive of disease progression. [17][18][19] Obviously, SVP could be employed more efficiently if its etiology was better understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, improved SVP monitoring could benefit subjects requiring regular or long term ICP monitoring. 7 Various associations have also been reported between SVP and glaucoma: (1) venous pulsation evoked by ophthalmodynamometry indicates higher venous pressure in glaucoma subjects, [8][9][10] (2) SVP incidence is lower in glaucoma, [11][12][13][14] (3) SVP is related to the severity of functional damage, 11,13,15,16 and (4) SVP is predictive of disease progression. [17][18][19] Obviously, SVP could be employed more efficiently if its etiology was better understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sisler device was less comfortable for volunteers than the others and so it was impractical to routinely take three measurements with this device. However, previously published venous COV data [13] were compared and found to be significantly higher (21.0%) than the OcuDyn (p=0.0014, one-way ANOVA on ranks) but not different from Meditron (p=0.63, one-way ANOVA on ranks).…”
Section: Comparison Of Three Ophthalmodynamometersmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This provides excellent visualization of the fundus and improved reproducibility of measurements, with coefficients of variation of 16.3% for retinal vein and 8.5% for retinal arterial diastolic forces [11]. This compares favorably to the Sisler ophthalmodynamometer [12], which has a retinal vein coefficient of variation of 21% [13]. All ophthalmodynamometer measurements are in force units without a known intraocular pressure (IOP) correlate so that the induced IOP remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The study may add to the clinical application of modern ophthalmodynamometry as already demonstrated in previous investigations on glaucoma, measurement of intracerebral pressure, assessment of tissue pressure in the orbit in patients with endocrine orbitopathy, ischaemic ophthalmopathy and retinal vein occlusions. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%