2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10905-010-9201-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Foraging Behavior of Lysiphlebus fabarum (Marshall), a Thelytokous Parasitoid of the Black Bean Aphid in Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, Rasekh et al (2010a), studying the same strain of L. fabarum, showed that proportional time allocation to within-patch behaviors was not affected by factors such as female age, egg load, day length, encounters with conspecifics, or encounters with previously-parasitized hosts, although with the exception of conspecific encounters, these factors did affect overall patch residence time and numbers of aphids parasitized. Previously, Rasekh et al (2010a), studying the same strain of L. fabarum, showed that proportional time allocation to within-patch behaviors was not affected by factors such as female age, egg load, day length, encounters with conspecifics, or encounters with previously-parasitized hosts, although with the exception of conspecific encounters, these factors did affect overall patch residence time and numbers of aphids parasitized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, Rasekh et al (2010a), studying the same strain of L. fabarum, showed that proportional time allocation to within-patch behaviors was not affected by factors such as female age, egg load, day length, encounters with conspecifics, or encounters with previously-parasitized hosts, although with the exception of conspecific encounters, these factors did affect overall patch residence time and numbers of aphids parasitized. Previously, Rasekh et al (2010a), studying the same strain of L. fabarum, showed that proportional time allocation to within-patch behaviors was not affected by factors such as female age, egg load, day length, encounters with conspecifics, or encounters with previously-parasitized hosts, although with the exception of conspecific encounters, these factors did affect overall patch residence time and numbers of aphids parasitized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Body size could influence parasitoid foraging strategies via effects on other physiological and ecological traits (Godfray, 1994;Roitberg et al, 2001). Foraging strategy may change, as a function of parasitoid age (Weisser, 1994;Rasekh et al, 2010a) and body size could affect foraging behavior via an effect on life expectancy (Fletcher et al, 1994;Ellers et al, 2000). Foraging strategy may change, as a function of parasitoid age (Weisser, 1994;Rasekh et al, 2010a) and body size could affect foraging behavior via an effect on life expectancy (Fletcher et al, 1994;Ellers et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproduction in A. colemani and L. testaceipes seems to be limited by time because females of these species parasitize a very high number of hosts during the first three days of their life. Indeed, Rasekh et al (2010) report that females of Lysiphlebus fabarum (Marshall) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) are more likely to be time-limited than egg-limited because they lay most of their eggs early in life. In contrast, the parasitoids P. volucre and P. palitans appear to be egg-limited, i.e., these females need a long lifespan to maximize offspring production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important to understand the behaviour of the parasitoid in selecting its principal and alternative hosts in a crop, prior to any release in the fi eld (Dorn et al, 1999, Hopkinson et al, 2013. Successful parasitism requires a series of interactions among parasitoids, their hosts and host plants, including habitat fi nding, host location, host acceptance, host suitability and host regulation (Vinson, 1976(Vinson, , 1984Hatano et al, 2008;Rasekh et al, 2010). Parasitoids may respond to semiochemical cues during antennal contact and ovipositor probing (Muratori et al, 2006;Larocca et al, 2007) and volatile chemical compounds emitted by damaged plants (Turlings et al, 1990, Mattiacci et al, 1994, Dicke et al, 2003.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%