1992
DOI: 10.1142/s021820259200003x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fokker-Planck Operator as an Asymptotic Limit

Abstract: It is shown that the Fokker-Planck operator describing a highly peaked scattering process in the linear transport equation is a formal asymptotic limit of the exact integral operator. It is also shown that such peaking is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for the Fokker-Planck operator to be a legitimate description of such scattering. In particular, the widely used Henyey-Greenstein scattering kernel does not possess a Fokker-Planck limit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the choice of S 1 is arbitrary, any circle of given radius would be dealt with in the same fashion. The singularity of kernel tends to favor grazing collisions, and as a consequence this LR regime bears some strong similarities with the classical peakedforward regime [20,23,25], with the forward effect magnified by the singularity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Note that the choice of S 1 is arbitrary, any circle of given radius would be dealt with in the same fashion. The singularity of kernel tends to favor grazing collisions, and as a consequence this LR regime bears some strong similarities with the classical peakedforward regime [20,23,25], with the forward effect magnified by the singularity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Note that equation (5.3) can also be derived formally from the radiative transfer equation (3.17). First, one considers that scattering is sharply peaked in the forward scattering direction, so that it is possible to take the Fokker-Planck approximation, that is to say, the right-hand side of (3.17) can be approximated by a diffusion operator in K [24,18]. Second, one considers that the source emission is sharply peaked and that the propagation distance is short enough so that the wave remains in the form of a narrow cone beam.…”
Section: The Paraxial Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(11) combining the terms containing tissue optical properties into one term I(r, ω), (12) where (13) It is now clear that one can substitute altered optical coefficients, , and a new phase function f* in (12) without affecting the solution as long as the quantity I remains unchanged. This leads to the similarity relations requirement: (14) Upon expanding the radiance and phase functions in spherical harmonics, using orthogonality and the addition theorem for Legendre polynomials, one arrives at the following system of equations: (15) which can also be written (16) where f n , are the Legendre moments of f HG , f*, respectively. The quantities I n combine the optical properties of the medium and the properties of the scattering phase function.…”
Section: Similarity Theory (St Model)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence an approximate phase function that preserves only a few of the momentum transfer moments should be a good approximation to the exact phase function. However, the precise behavior of the momentum transfer moments as n increases depends very sensitively on the specific description of the single scattering function f. For example, the Henyey-Greenstein phase function, f HG , is such that even when the average cosine g of the scattering angle μ 0 is close to 1 (but not equal to 1) its momentum transfer coefficients, ξ n do not decrease with increasing n [16,17]. Indeed, the merit of each CH method requires a more careful analysis than intuitively based arguments can provide.…”
Section: Discrete Scattering Angles (Dsa Model)mentioning
confidence: 99%