2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The flux of DOC from the UK – Predicting the role of soils, land use and net watershed losses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
46
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
6
46
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, monitoring headwater catchments was necessary to disentangle both types of processes, as observed downstream export regimes may not describe well the dynamics of landto-stream transfer (Worrall et al, 2012;Minaudo et al, 2015;Temnerud et al, 2016;Baronas et al, 2017). Furthermore, both upstream processes (e.g., summer SRP release) and downstream contributions (e.g., point-source SRP contribution during summer) may lead to the same export regime (e.g., high SRP during low flow); this phenomenon creates epistemic uncertainty, which may lead to equifinality problems when calibrating catchment models to the data (Beven, 2013).…”
Section: Implications For Monitoring and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, monitoring headwater catchments was necessary to disentangle both types of processes, as observed downstream export regimes may not describe well the dynamics of landto-stream transfer (Worrall et al, 2012;Minaudo et al, 2015;Temnerud et al, 2016;Baronas et al, 2017). Furthermore, both upstream processes (e.g., summer SRP release) and downstream contributions (e.g., point-source SRP contribution during summer) may lead to the same export regime (e.g., high SRP during low flow); this phenomenon creates epistemic uncertainty, which may lead to equifinality problems when calibrating catchment models to the data (Beven, 2013).…”
Section: Implications For Monitoring and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 iii) An evaluation of the E2:E3, E2:E4, E4:E6 ratios, and SUVA (absorbance at 254 nm 31 normalised to DOC concentration) as indicators of DOC quality showed that the E4:E6 ratio 32 was subject to extensive variation over time, and was highly correlated between surface water 33 and pore water, suggesting that it is a useful metric to determine temporal changes in DOC 34 quality. 35 iv) A repeated weekly analysis over twelve weeks showed no consistent change in UV-Vis 36 absorbance, and therefore an inferred lack of degradation of total DOC in samples that were 37 filtered and stored in the dark at 4°C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occasionally DOC is calculated for a specific site using a 88 calibration generated elsewhere 37 However, the study in question 33 investigated 400 nm as a proxy which is within the visible 92 spectrum. Absorbance in visible wavelengths is used in the water industry as it is important 93 to the aesthetic quality of treated waters, but as humic substances are coloured to varying 94 degrees 20 a wavelength in this region may not be the most appropriate proxy for total DOC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TOC, DON and DOP exports are dependent on climatic and hydrologic factors (Sobek et al 2007;Sarkkola et al 2009), soil organic matter stocks (Sobek et al 2007), land use (Pellerin et al 2006;Mattsson et al 2009;Kindler et al 2011) and management such as forest cutting (Schelker et al 2012), ditching (Joensuu et al 2002), peat mining (Kløve 2001) and other agricultural practices (Worrall et al 2012). In the boreal region lake water, C is mainly of allochthonous origin, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%