The Fluoride Ion Release from Ion-Releasing Dental Materials after Surface Loading by Topical Treatment with Sodium Fluoride Gel

Kelić, Marija; Kilić, Domagoj; Kelić, Katarina; Šutej, Ivana; Par, Matej; Peroš, Kristina; Tarle, Zrinka

doi:10.3390/jfb14020102

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 36 publications

(57 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similarly, Wang et al examined the effects of coating on initial F release from resinmodified GIC 49) . Furthermore, Kelić et al reported that the presence of a dental adhesive system or GIC coating significantly reduced the recharge capacity compared to uncoated materials 50) . In contrast to previous findings, Tay et al proposed that adhesives could act as permeable membranes and aid in remineralizing tooth structure, halting the caries process 51) .…”

Section: Qualitative Study and Outcome Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bioactivity and remineralization potential of modified glass ionomer cement: A systematic review of the impact of calcium and phosphate ion release

TUYGUNOV,

KHAIRUNNISA,

YAHYA

et al. 2024

Dent. Mater. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review investigates whether the release of calcium (Ca) and phosphate (P) ions significantly affect bioactivity properties to allow for further intervention in modified GIC powder manufacture and increase remineralization properties under in vitro conditions. Researchers have explored modifying dental materials with Ca and phosphate-based chemical compounds to promote the release of Ca, P and F ions [21][22][23][24][25] . Skrtic et al. 23) found that incorporating a Ca phosphate-based compound can potentially remineralize carious enamel lesions. Assessing the addition of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) to GICs, Mazzaoui et al. and Al Zraikat et al. found that modifying 3% or 5% of CPP-ACP leads to significantly decreased F release, but increased Ca and P ion release 21,22) .Another study showed that modifying 1.56% (w/w) CPP-ACP into a GIC increases mechanical properties and releases Ca, P and F ions 22) . Modifying GIC with nanohydroxyapatite, a biologically active Ca, P mineral, resulted in positive enhancements in mechanical characteristics, antibacterial properties, ion release, and reduction of microleakage and cytotoxicity 26) . Replacing CaO and CaF2 in GIC with strontium substitutions (SrO and SrF2) increased radiopacity and F ion release 25) .Nonetheless, according to other definitions that prioritize the ability of materials to promote remineralization, GIC is not commonly considered bioactive. These definitions that characterize a substance as bioactive indicate that it has the ability to generate a material layer, like apatite, which is intrinsic and compatible with the human body [27][28][29][30] . Regarding this topic, materials are generally considered bioactive if

show abstract

Section: Qualitative Study and Outcome Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bioactivity and remineralization potential of modified glass ionomer cement: A systematic review of the impact of calcium and phosphate ion release

TUYGUNOV,

KHAIRUNNISA,

YAHYA

et al. 2024

Dent. Mater. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Enhancing mechanical strength of Sr-based oxyfluoride glasses in glass ionomer cement through phase separation

Teimoory,

Rezaie,

Yekta

et al. 2024

Ceramics International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fluoride Release by Restorative Materials after the Application of Surface Coating Agents: A Systematic Review

Tokarczuk,

Kiryk

et al. 2024

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Fluoride is vital in dentistry for caries prevention, enhancing remineralization, and inhibiting bacteria. Incorporating fluoride into restorative materials like glass-ionomer cements, compomers, and giomers has significantly increased fluoride availability in the oral cavity. This review assesses how surface coatings influence fluoride release from various dental restorative materials. Methods: In December 2023, we conducted electronic searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS) databases. In the Scopus database, the results were refined to titles, abstracts, and keywords, while in PubMed, they were narrowed down to titles and abstracts. In WoS, the results were refined only to abstracts. The search criteria were based on the terms fluoride AND release AND (coating OR glaze OR layer OR film OR varnish) AND (composite OR glass OR compomer), following PRISMA guidelines and the PICO framework. Twenty-three studies were rigorously selected and analyzed for fluoride release from coated versus uncoated materials. Results: Surface coatings typically reduce the rate of fluoride release. Glass-ionomer cements had the highest release, followed by giomers and compomers. The initial release was greater in uncoated materials but stabilized over time, influenced by variables like artificial saliva and deionized water. Conclusions: Surface coatings generally decrease fluoride release rates from dental materials. Although initial rates are high, contributing to caries prevention, more standardized research is needed to better understand the impact of coatings and optimize materials for maximum preventive benefits.

show abstract

The Fluoride Ion Release from Ion-Releasing Dental Materials after Surface Loading by Topical Treatment with Sodium Fluoride Gel

Cited by 4 publications

References 36 publications

Bioactivity and remineralization potential of modified glass ionomer cement: A systematic review of the impact of calcium and phosphate ion release

Bioactivity and remineralization potential of modified glass ionomer cement: A systematic review of the impact of calcium and phosphate ion release

Enhancing mechanical strength of Sr-based oxyfluoride glasses in glass ionomer cement through phase separation

Fluoride Release by Restorative Materials after the Application of Surface Coating Agents: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About