2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fluid Flow in the T-Junction. The Comparison of the Numerical Modeling and Piv Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its magnitude has been observed to be mostly between 1% and 4 % of the bulk mean velocity in most straight ducts with a noncircular cross section, but the effects on wall shear stress distribution and heat transfer rates are quite significant. The defect of the first‐order models is shown being fatal in square‐duct flows where the secondary flow normal to the axis of a duct is induced . So, some form of Reynolds stress modeling is usually required in order to calculate this type of secondary motion.…”
Section: Theoretical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its magnitude has been observed to be mostly between 1% and 4 % of the bulk mean velocity in most straight ducts with a noncircular cross section, but the effects on wall shear stress distribution and heat transfer rates are quite significant. The defect of the first‐order models is shown being fatal in square‐duct flows where the secondary flow normal to the axis of a duct is induced . So, some form of Reynolds stress modeling is usually required in order to calculate this type of secondary motion.…”
Section: Theoretical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The defect of the first-order models is shown being fatal in square-duct flows where the secondary flow normal to the axis of a duct is induced. 8,13 So, some form of Reynolds stress modeling is usually required in order to calculate this type of secondary motion. The second-order models have the potential of properly expressing strong anisotropy of turbulence.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analytical study was reported by El-Morshdy which was based on a steady, incompressible, irrotational flow in two-dimensional geometry with zero inclination between the central chimney & outlet nozzle. However, the mixing of fluid flows in T-junction and X-junction was reported by various researchers [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Here T-junction allows incoming fluid streams to be combined into one outlet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steady state 3-dimensional CFD simulations were carried out to predict the mean velocity and mean temperature using standard j-e turbulence model which were found to be in good agreement with the measurements. Fluid flow simulation in a T-junction (with 90°a ngle and 50 mm diameter of each branch) was done by Stigler et al [9] using both numerical modelling and PIV measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example numerical study of fluid flow has been presented in the [7,8]. The PIV measurement of the fluid flow in the pipe junction has been described in [9] The Comparison of the PIV measurement with numerical solution of fluid flow in [10]. The first new characteristics obtained by measuring and its comparison with CFD calculations were presented at [11].…”
Section: Introduction Amentioning
confidence: 99%