Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1988
DOI: 10.1063/1.866783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The fluctuating wall-shear stress and the velocity field in the viscous sublayer

Abstract: The fluctuating wall-shear stress was measured with various types of hot-wire and hot-film sensors in turbulent boundary-layer and channel flows. The rms level of the streamwise wall-shear stress fluctuations was found to be 40% of the mean value, which was substantiated by measurements of the streamwise velocity fluctuations in the viscous sublayer. Heat transfer to the fluid via the probe substrate was found to give significant differences between the static and dynamic response for standard flush-mounted ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

31
140
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
31
140
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the existence of negative shear stress events cannot be distinguished with hot wires, hence no further assessment can be made to that effect. The values of higher order moments are also shown in figure 5(a); their value being smaller than those commonly reported in the literature (S ≈ 1 and K ≈ 4.8 by (Alfredsson et al, 1988)) probably due to wireresolution effects (Talamelli et al, 2013).…”
Section: Fluctuating Shear Stress τmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the existence of negative shear stress events cannot be distinguished with hot wires, hence no further assessment can be made to that effect. The values of higher order moments are also shown in figure 5(a); their value being smaller than those commonly reported in the literature (S ≈ 1 and K ≈ 4.8 by (Alfredsson et al, 1988)) probably due to wireresolution effects (Talamelli et al, 2013).…”
Section: Fluctuating Shear Stress τmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…On the other hand, constant temperature anemometry enables the instantaneous value of the wall shear stress to be determined. Due to their large thermal inertia, hot films present a damping of the fluctuations in low thermal conductivity fluids (as first reported by Alfredsson et al, 1988); hence a wall-mounted hot wire will be employed due to its better frequency response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a study involving conventional hot-film shear stress probes, Alfredsson et al noted that using the static calibration to reduce dynamic data resulted in a significant under-prediction of the rms turbulent shear stress levels when there was substantial heat conduction to the substrate. 6 Specifically, large variations were reported in the axial turbulent wall shear stress intensity / rms w τ τ ′ . Because of the unknown dynamic response of thermal sensors, it is virtually impossible to separate errors in spatial averaging from those due to unsteady heat conduction.…”
Section: 248mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Similarly, the ratio of the convective time scale to the Kolmogorov time scale ℑ τ is the wall shear stress, and ρ is the density) is often used to determine the spatial resolution performance of probes in turbulent boundary layers, the above scaling is sufficient to illustrate the stringent spatial resolution requirements for turbulent flows. 6 In addition, a flat frequency response function is desired for turbulence measurements so that the spectra and statistical moments are accurately estimated. If the required data analysis requires correlation analysis, a zero-phase frequency response function over a wide frequency range is also desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its advantages, in order to make this technology of practical applicability, the sensor should be insensitive to the thermal characteristics of substrate on which it is installed, and should provide a rapid response to fluctuations of shear stress [8]. In this sense several proposals emerged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%