Abstract:We use a new dataset to study how mutual fund flows depend on past performance across 28 countries. We show that there are marked differences in the flow-performance relationship across countries, suggesting that U.S. findings concerning its shape do not apply universally. We find that mutual fund investors sell losers more and buy winners less in more developed countries. This is because investors in more developed countries are more sophisticated and face lower costs of participating in the mutual fund indus… Show more
“…Spanish funds also seem to be relatively poor performers. Ferreira, Keswani, Miguel, and Ramos (2012) find average Jensen's alphas for Spanish equity funds of À1.68%, while the sample average for 28 countries is À0.47%. Ferreira, Keswani, Miguel, and Ramos (2012) identify Spain as the worst performer in terms of Jensen's alphas, and the second-to-last in terms of four-factor alphas.…”
Section: Size Of Asset Management Industrymentioning
“…Spanish funds also seem to be relatively poor performers. Ferreira, Keswani, Miguel, and Ramos (2012) find average Jensen's alphas for Spanish equity funds of À1.68%, while the sample average for 28 countries is À0.47%. Ferreira, Keswani, Miguel, and Ramos (2012) identify Spain as the worst performer in terms of Jensen's alphas, and the second-to-last in terms of four-factor alphas.…”
Section: Size Of Asset Management Industrymentioning
“…(Barber, Huang, and Odean, 2016;Sensoy, 2009;Ferreira, Keswani, Miguel Ramos, 2012). These investor behaviors are suboptimal, because mutual fund performance does not persist (e.g., Carhart, 1997;Fama and French, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferreira et al (2012) analyzed the relationship between flows and performance in a group of 28 countries (excluding Israel) and found a convex relationship worldwide between these two factors, with higher convexity in less developed countries.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
This paper examines the influence of past performance on Israeli equity mutual funds' net flows between January 2004 and July 2014, using the most recommended and reliable two-cluster regression methodology. Apparently, Israeli investors are more sensitive to risk adjusted returns than absolute returns and the most recent performance seems to be more influential on fund flows than on longer-term past performance. Moreover, investors flock to the latest winners and do not leave the funds with the poorest performance. The effect of past performance seems to be more salient on flows of advertised funds than of those with no advertisement. The results in Israel augment the scant work on mutual fund flows outside the US and add support to a growing body of literature documenting irrational investor behavior worldwide.
“…Given the international nature of the sample, we use country‐specific risk factors, specifically market premium, size, and book‐to‐market international risk factors obtained from Ferreira et al. (, ). The definition of variables GAAP_surprise and NG_adjustment is based on Marques’ () methodology but takes into consideration the measurement issues discussed by Cohen et al.…”
We study the market's reaction to the disclosure of non‐GAAP earnings measures that are combined with high impression management. We construct an impression management score that captures several communication techniques that managers often use to positively bias investors’ perceptions of firm performance. We hand‐collect and code both quantitative and qualitative information from earnings announcement press releases of large European firms. Our results indicate that non‐GAAP measures are informative to capital markets. However, non‐GAAP adjustments are more persistent when accompanied by higher levels of impression management. This evidence is consistent with managers attempting to distort users’ perceptions when non‐GAAP adjustments are of lower quality. Market reaction tests suggest that investors are able to see through managers’ intentions and discount non‐GAAP information that is accompanied by high impression management. Moreover, investors in more sophisticated markets penalize non‐GAAP measures communicated with high impression management. Our results are robust to a battery of sensitivity tests, including the use of a machine‐coded tone measure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.