1991
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.31.246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The flow field in air-water vertical bubbling jets in a cylindrical vessel.

Abstract: Also, the flow rate, momentum and kinetic energy of rising waterwere determined, being necessary to refine previous theoretical models predicting the fluid behavior induced by bubbles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was to be expected indeed, but a detailed description of the exact role of the gas phase in producing anisotropy of turbulence -and its proportions -was not given. Iguchi, Takeuchi & Morita (1991) found that the velocity fluctuations may be of the same order of magnitude as the mean velocities (100 % turbulence intensities), and follow a Gaussian distribution. In the experiments of Johansen et al (1988), measured turbulent intensities were weaker axially than in the experiment of Iguchi et al (1991), i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was to be expected indeed, but a detailed description of the exact role of the gas phase in producing anisotropy of turbulence -and its proportions -was not given. Iguchi, Takeuchi & Morita (1991) found that the velocity fluctuations may be of the same order of magnitude as the mean velocities (100 % turbulence intensities), and follow a Gaussian distribution. In the experiments of Johansen et al (1988), measured turbulent intensities were weaker axially than in the experiment of Iguchi et al (1991), i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iguchi, Takeuchi & Morita (1991) found that the velocity fluctuations may be of the same order of magnitude as the mean velocities (100 % turbulence intensities), and follow a Gaussian distribution. In the experiments of Johansen et al (1988), measured turbulent intensities were weaker axially than in the experiment of Iguchi et al (1991), i.e. about 50 %, but still substantially stronger in the radial direction (>100 %) except near the free surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bubble motions characterized by bubble frequency, f B , gas holdup, a, mean bubble rising velocity, ū B , and mean bubble diameter, d¯B, were measured with a two-needle electroresistivity probe. 21,22) The number of bubbles passing through the needle tip in 1 s is defined as the bubble frequency. The gas holdup is calculated from:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7). The previous study 15) revealed that the sub-boundary (3) By referring to the discussion on the sub-boundary (4) in a bath agitated by bottom liquid injection, 12) the following first two methods will be proposed for a bath agitated by bottom gas injection.…”
Section: Sub-boundary (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the previous paper 12) for a bath agitated by (7) where k 1 Ј and k 12 are constants, Q Ls is the liquid flow rate at the bath surface, 12,[14][15][16][17] u L, cl is the centerline velocity of liquid flow, b u is the half-value radius of the axial velocity distribution of the liquid flow, and H L is the bath depth. The bubble dispersion region in the bath is called the bubbling jet.…”
Section: Prediction Of Four Sub-boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%