2023
DOI: 10.1108/hff-11-2022-0655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The flow and heat in the conical region of a rotating cone and an expanding disk

Abstract: Purpose The fluid flow and heat transfer between a rotating cone above a stretching disk is the prime purpose of the current work. Making use of suitable similarity transformations, it is shown that the physical phenomenon is represented by a system of similarity equations, which is compatible with that of literature in the absence of wall expansion. Design/methodology/approach Numerical simulation of the system enables us to seize the physical character of fluid filling the conical section as well as of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turkyilmazoglu (2020) extended the self-similar model of Shevchuk (2009) by including a term that considers the thermal conductivity in the fluid in the marching radial direction and performed calculations for conicity angles of 4°and 45°at Pr ¼ 0.71 (air), but only for an angle of 45°the calculated data of Turkyilmazoglu (2020) differed quite significantly from the results of Shevchuk (2009). Turkyilmazoglu (2023) extended the model of Turkyilmazoglu (2020) to the case of a rotating cone and a radially stretching disk according to a specially chosen law. Gul et al (2020Gul et al ( , 2021a and Gul et al (2021b) used the self-similar approach of Shevchuk (2004aShevchuk ( , 2004b) not including radial thermal conductivity in combination with a nanofluid model for small and large conical gaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turkyilmazoglu (2020) extended the self-similar model of Shevchuk (2009) by including a term that considers the thermal conductivity in the fluid in the marching radial direction and performed calculations for conicity angles of 4°and 45°at Pr ¼ 0.71 (air), but only for an angle of 45°the calculated data of Turkyilmazoglu (2020) differed quite significantly from the results of Shevchuk (2009). Turkyilmazoglu (2023) extended the model of Turkyilmazoglu (2020) to the case of a rotating cone and a radially stretching disk according to a specially chosen law. Gul et al (2020Gul et al ( , 2021a and Gul et al (2021b) used the self-similar approach of Shevchuk (2004aShevchuk ( , 2004b) not including radial thermal conductivity in combination with a nanofluid model for small and large conical gaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%