2019
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1687854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Florida Sleeve Procedure Is Durable and Improves Aortic Valve Function

Abstract: Background The Florida (FL) Sleeve procedure was introduced as a simplified approach for valve-sparing correction of functional Type I aortic insufficiency (AI) associated with aortic root aneurysms. In this study, short- and long-term outcomes after the FL Sleeve procedure were investigated. Methods From May 2002 to January 2016, 177 patients underwent the FL Sleeve procedure. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular ejection fractio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These were introduced with the aim of simplifying the repair and shortening associated cross-clamp times by negating the need for coronary artery reimplantation or formal replacement of the aortic root. [14][15][16] These procedures do not replace the aortic root per se but they provide the root and ascending aorta with external support to prevent dilatation. One study utilized computed models and simulations to compare the efficacy of the sleeve procedure to the remodeling and reimplantation techniques.…”
Section: The First Aortic Root Replacement Was Demonstrated In 1968 Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These were introduced with the aim of simplifying the repair and shortening associated cross-clamp times by negating the need for coronary artery reimplantation or formal replacement of the aortic root. [14][15][16] These procedures do not replace the aortic root per se but they provide the root and ascending aorta with external support to prevent dilatation. One study utilized computed models and simulations to compare the efficacy of the sleeve procedure to the remodeling and reimplantation techniques.…”
Section: The First Aortic Root Replacement Was Demonstrated In 1968 Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the newer valve‐sparing alternatives to formal VSRR include the personalized external aortic root support (PEARS) and Florida sleeve procedures. These were introduced with the aim of simplifying the repair and shortening associated cross‐clamp times by negating the need for coronary artery reimplantation or formal replacement of the aortic root 14–16 . These procedures do not replace the aortic root per se but they provide the root and ascending aorta with external support to prevent dilatation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 , 45 Reimplantation can be performed by preserving the native aortic root wall tissue (Florida sleeve). 46 Remodeling can be performed using three separate neosinus patches, 47 which facilitates partial remodeling procedures, especially in cases of acute aortic dissection. Each technique provides an acceptable outcome, however, discussing the superiority of one technique over others is beyond the scope of this review, but this issue is discussed in other articles.…”
Section: Technical Components Of Aortic Valve-preserving Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Florida Sleeve technique for root remodeling with preservation of the aortic valve and sinuses is a well-established technique for saving the aortic valve while narrowing the annulus and sinotubular junction (12)(13)(14)(15). Allowing the patient to keep their native aortic valve decreases the risk of bleeding issues related to mechanical valves as well as circumvents the potential need for the future re-intervention with a bioprosthetic valve (16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%