2013
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hht049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Flip Side of Financial Synergies: Coinsurance Versus Risk Contamination

Abstract: This paper characterizes when joint …nancing of two projects through debt increases expected default costs, contrary to conventional wisdom. Separate …nancing dominates joint …nancing when risk-contamination losses (associated to the contagious default of a well-performing project that is dragged down by a poorly-performing project) outweigh standard coinsurance gains. Separate …nancing becomes more attractive than joint …nancing when the fraction of returns lost under default increases and when projects have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Berkovitch and Kim (1990), John and John (1991), and Chemmanur and John (1996) continued the tradition of formal modelling to include agency cost benefits, tax benefits, and bankruptcy costs in PF. These results were later supported by the formal works on the optimal scope of firms from Leland (2007) and Banal-Estañol et al (2013). These finance models positioned PF as a superior form of financing for high risk investments, but they strongly focused on financial benefits and applied rather restrictive formal modelling.…”
Section: Financial Researchmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Berkovitch and Kim (1990), John and John (1991), and Chemmanur and John (1996) continued the tradition of formal modelling to include agency cost benefits, tax benefits, and bankruptcy costs in PF. These results were later supported by the formal works on the optimal scope of firms from Leland (2007) and Banal-Estañol et al (2013). These finance models positioned PF as a superior form of financing for high risk investments, but they strongly focused on financial benefits and applied rather restrictive formal modelling.…”
Section: Financial Researchmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…where Y it is an indicator variable equal to 1 when the firm goes bankrupt at time t. The vector x includes the predictive variables from Campbell, Hilscher, and Szilagyi (2008). 6 We experiment with two different dependent variables, a narrower one (default) and a broader one (failure), as alternative indicators of financial distress. Default events includes cases filed under both Chapter 7 and Chapter 11, while failure also includes a default on a bond.…”
Section: The Value Of Survival and The Conglomerate Discountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c. We can define the differential values across organizations, by appropriately combining Equations (5), (6), and (7), as follows: increases in its relative survival ability. Therefore, the larger the true diversification premium of a firm, the larger its "market" diversification discount.…”
Section: Proposition 3: Survivorship Bias and Diversification Discountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another branch of the literature explores international policy coordination. 8 Bengui (2014) studies a two-country model with risk-averse agents. Liquidity hoarding provides an imperfect substitute for state contingent contracts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To see that the difference λqk − (1 − λ) mk is positive, use equations(5) and(6) to solve out R as a function of w and substitute in equation(8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%