The Flexibility of the Workweek in the United States: Evidence From the Fifa World Cup

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SIZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. In this paper I explore the flexibility of the work week in the United States, using the FIFA Soccer World Cup as a natural experiment. My empirical strategy exploits the exogenous variation that arises due to which country hosts the World Cup, as this will determine the time games are broadcast across different time zones in the United States. The hour of the day when games are broadcast differentially affects hours of work across different time zones. Further, the calendar timing of the World Cup allows me to compare labor market outcomes in June/July for a worker in World Cup year t, with the outcomes in June/July for a worker in non-World Cup years t + 1, t + 2 and t + 3. My results highlight the importance of the worker's pay frequency in their work week flexibility, as all differences in hours of work due to the World Cup are concentrated among salary paid workers, while hourly paid workers do not change their market hours during the World Cup. Also, my results show that after controlling for observable demographic characteristics as well as year and month fixed effects, a worker reduces on average his weekly number of hours of work during the World Cup by statistically significant estimates that range from 9 weekly minutes to 28 weekly minutes, depending on specification choice and time of the day during which World Cup games are broadcast live in the U.S.JEL Classification: J22, L83

Play Hard, Shirk Hard? The Effect of Bar Hours Regulation on Worker Absence

“…3 We treat usual hours as synonymous with contractual hours. This is similar in spirit to the approach used in previous research by Barmby et al (2002), Lozano (2010) and Green and Navarro (2012), among others. training episodes, industrial disputes, vacations and public holidays.…”

“…This is similar in spirit to the approach used in previous research by Barmby et al . (), Lozano () and Green and Navarro (), among others.…”

Does Raising the School Leaving Age Reduce Teacher Effort? Evidence From a Policy Experiment

“…6 6 We consider usual hours as synonymous with contractual hours. This is similar in spirit to the approach used in previous research such as Hamermesh, Myers, and Pocock (2008) and Lozano (2011). …”

Do immigrants work longer hours than natives in Europe?

“…They concluded that, in both countries, workers' decisions regarding their labour supply are positively related to earnings inequality in their occupation. In addition, Lozano (2011) investigated the flexibility of the workweeks in the U.S. during the F.I.F.A. World Cup, while Bratti and Staffolani (2007) reported that future earnings might be affected by working hours in that current working hours are seen an investment in future earnings, as mentioned in the human capital theory proposed by Becker (1963).…”