2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05281-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Flares of Low back pain with Activity Research Study (FLAReS): study protocol for a case-crossover study nested within a cohort study

Abstract: Background Although it is generally accepted that physical activity and flares of low back pain (LBP) are related, evidence for the directionality of this association is mixed. The Flares of Low back pain with Activity Research Study (FLAReS) takes a novel approach to distinguish the short-term effects of specific physical activities on LBP flares from the cumulative effects of such activities, by conducting a longitudinal case-crossover study nested within a cohort study. The first aim is to e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is also possible that some of the respondents may have misunderstood the NRS-UP (A) question item, indicating a possible need for better explanations regarding its use, changes to the question items, or participant-completed reconciliation of implausible values for the NRS-UP (A) and conventional NRS. We have incorporated such changes into ongoing studies using the NRS-UP (A) , 17 which have yielded a 2% prevalence of negative values of E A , and a 2% prevalence of missing responses for both the NRS-UP (A) and the conventional NRS (unpublished data). These findings reassure that most individuals understand the NRS-UP (A) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also possible that some of the respondents may have misunderstood the NRS-UP (A) question item, indicating a possible need for better explanations regarding its use, changes to the question items, or participant-completed reconciliation of implausible values for the NRS-UP (A) and conventional NRS. We have incorporated such changes into ongoing studies using the NRS-UP (A) , 17 which have yielded a 2% prevalence of negative values of E A , and a 2% prevalence of missing responses for both the NRS-UP (A) and the conventional NRS (unpublished data). These findings reassure that most individuals understand the NRS-UP (A) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%