2012
DOI: 10.1080/1359432x.2012.716198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Five-Factor Model, forced-choice personality inventories and performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis of academic and occupational validity studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
137
2
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 182 publications
13
137
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Another limitation of this study is that the RR estimates found here are applicable only to single‐stimulus (SS) personality inventories. At present, they are not applicable to forced‐choice (FC) inventories (Salgado & Tauriz, ; Salgado, Moscoso et al, ). Although FC inventories may be affected by faking, the effect may be different both for the mean and the SD .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of this study is that the RR estimates found here are applicable only to single‐stimulus (SS) personality inventories. At present, they are not applicable to forced‐choice (FC) inventories (Salgado & Tauriz, ; Salgado, Moscoso et al, ). Although FC inventories may be affected by faking, the effect may be different both for the mean and the SD .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por ejemplo, en el caso de las medidas de personalidad se han aportado nuevas evidencias sobre estas herramientas (Salgado, Moscoso y Berges, 2013;Salgado, Moscoso, Sánchez, Alonso, Choragwicka y Berges, 2015). A este respecto, es el hallazgo realizado por Salgado y sus colaboradores (Salgado, Anderson y Táuriz, 2015;Salgado y Táuriz, 2014) sobre la existencia de importantes diferencias en la capacidad predictiva de los diversos tipos de medidas de personalidad. Estos autores encontraron que el uso de medidas quasi-ipsativas permitía obtener niveles de validez predictiva superiores a los obtenidos con medidas normativas e ipsativas.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The second issue is whether SS personality inventories are more valid predictors of job performance than FC inventories. Neither of these issues was specifically examined in the meta‐analyses of Bartram (, ) and Salgado and Tauriz (). Consequently, there are important differences between the present meta‐analytic effort and Salgado and Tauriz's () meta‐analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither of these issues was specifically examined in the meta‐analyses of Bartram (, ) and Salgado and Tauriz (). Consequently, there are important differences between the present meta‐analytic effort and Salgado and Tauriz's () meta‐analysis. The first difference is that the main objective of the present study is to examine the moderator effects of the occupational category on the validity of ipsative and quasi‐ipsative FC personality inventories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%