The Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire in Norway

Abstract

The aim of this study was to adapt the Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) for use in Norway. Three studies involving three different samples of university students (mean age 22 years, total N = 792) were conducted. Confirmatory factor analyses showed that a five factor structure provided an acceptable fit to the data. All five factors loaded significantly on the overall mindfulness factor. As expected, correlations between the FFMQ total scores and subscales were positive and significant, ranging from 0.45 to 0.65. Correlations between FFMQ total/subscales and Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) were significant and negative (since low scores on the MAAS indicate high mindfulness), ranging from r = -0.17 to -0.69. The Norwegian FFMQ total score was inversely correlated with all indicators of psychological health: neuroticism (r = -0.61), ruminative tendencies (r = -0.41), self-related negative thinking (r = -0.40), emotion regulation difficulties (r = -0.66) and depression (r = -0.46 to r = -0.65). In contrast to the other FFMQ subscales, the FFMQ Observe subscale did not have a positive relation to psychological health in our mostly non-meditating sample. However, being able to non-judgmentally observe one's inner life and environment is a part of the mindfulness construct that might emerge more clearly with more mindfulness training. We conclude that the Norwegian FFMQ has acceptable psychometric properties and can be recommended for use in Norway, especially in studies seeking to differentiate between different aspects of mindfulness and how these may change over time.

The Association between Self-Reported Difficulties in Emotion Regulation and Heart Rate Variability: The Salient Role of Not Accepting Negative Emotions

“…DERS showed excellent internal consistency in the current investigation (Chronbach’s α = 0.95). DERS was translated into Norwegian and validated in an Norwegian sample by Dundas et al (2013). Recent studies have confirmed DERS’ acceptable internal consistency, construct validity and factor structure (Fowler et al, 2014; Ritschel et al, 2015).…”

Return to work after vocational rehabilitation: does mindfulness matter?

“…All participants completed the Norwegian version55 of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ),56 which assesses five facets of a general tendency to be mindful in daily life: observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonreactivity to inner experience, and non-judging of inner experience. Examples of items are: “observing” facet, “I notice the smells and aromas of things”; “describing” facet, “I am good at finding words to describe my feelings”; “acting with awareness” facet, “I find myself doing things without paying attention” (scale reversed); “non-judging of inner feelings” facet, “I think some of my emotions are bad or inappropriate and I should not feel them” (scale reversed); and “nonreactivity to inner experience” facet, “I perceive my feelings and emotions without having to react to them.” The “nonreactivity to inner experience” facet consists of seven items, all other facets have eight items each.…”

Validity evidence of the brazilian version of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ)

“…The choice for the FFMQ was based on the review of the scientific literature, once this instrument is one of the most cited measures to assess mindfulness (Sauer et al, 2013). In addition, the FFMQ was adapted and validated in at least six countries to date being able to measure levels of mindfulness in a wide range of populations with or without meditation experience (Baer et al, 2008;Cebolla et al, 2012;Dundas, Vøllestad, Binder & Sivertsen, 2013;Hou, Wong, Lo, Mak, & Ma, 2013;Sugiura, Sato, Ito, & Murakami, 2012;Tran, Glück, & Nader, 2013;Veehof, Klooster, Taal, Westerhof, & Bohlmeijer, 2011).…”