2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2017.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fitting length of finite soluble groups II

Abstract: Let G be a finite soluble group, and let h(G) be the Fitting length of G. If ϕ is a fixed-point-free automorphism of G, that is C G (ϕ) = {1}, we denote by W (ϕ) the composition length of ϕ. A long-standing conjecture is that h(G) ≤ W (ϕ), and it is known that this bound is always true if the order of G is coprime to the order of ϕ. In this paper we find some bounds to h(G) in function of W (ϕ) without assuming that (|G|, |ϕ|) = 1. In particular we prove the validity of the "universal" bound h(G) < 7W (ϕ) 2. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are some nice bounds proved in the case that the action is fixed point free, that is, when C G (A)=1: Under some further assumptions on the structure of A and G, a linear bound has been obtained for h(G) depending on l(A) in [2,3], and [8]. A current article established a quadratic bound h(G) ≤ 7l(A) 2 without any further assumptions on A or G (see [6,Corollary 1.2]). Since Theorem F creates a bridge between the general case and the fixed point free case, we might hope to attack the general case by using Theorem F and those results for the fixed point free case.…”
Section: Question 17 Under the Hypothesis Of Theorem E Is F(g A) Boun...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, there are some nice bounds proved in the case that the action is fixed point free, that is, when C G (A)=1: Under some further assumptions on the structure of A and G, a linear bound has been obtained for h(G) depending on l(A) in [2,3], and [8]. A current article established a quadratic bound h(G) ≤ 7l(A) 2 without any further assumptions on A or G (see [6,Corollary 1.2]). Since Theorem F creates a bridge between the general case and the fixed point free case, we might hope to attack the general case by using Theorem F and those results for the fixed point free case.…”
Section: Question 17 Under the Hypothesis Of Theorem E Is F(g A) Boun...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By Proposition 4.1, we have α(|ϕ | S |) 4 deg(f (x)). Then by Dade's theorem [4] the Fitting height of S is bounded in terms of α(|ϕ | S |), and Jabara's paper [17] gives the bound 7 • α(|ϕ | S |) 2 . So, for each such prime q, we obtain h(S) 112 • deg(f (x)) 2 and therefore h(G/O q ′ ,q (G)) 1 + 112 • deg(f (x)) 2 .…”
Section: Proof Note That Deg(f (X))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step in the proof of both Theorems 1.3 and 1.4 is to use Hall-Higman type theorems (with certain modifications) for obtaining a reduction to the situation where ϕ has order bounded in terms of deg(f (x)). Then the proof of Theorem 1.3 follows by an application of a special case of Dade's theorem [4], or rather Jabara's [17] recent improvement for the bound for the Fitting height of a finite group admitting a fixed-point-free automorphism of not necessarily coprime order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 8.4.2 (Hoffman [25], Gross [19], Khukhro [27]; Jabara [31]). Consider a finite group G admitting a regular automorphism of order n, and let l n be the number of primes dividing n (counted with multiplicity).…”
Section: Split Polynomials (Fail)mentioning
confidence: 99%