2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12110-015-9237-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fitness Effects of Men’s Family Investments

Abstract: Men's investments in parenting and long-term reproductive relationships are a hallmark feature of human reproduction and life history. The uniqueness of such male involvement among catarrhines has driven an extensive debate surrounding the selective pressures that led to and maintain such capacities in men. Three major pathways have been proposed through which men's involvement might confer fitness benefits: enhancing child well-being, increasing couple fertility, and decreasing likelihood of partner desertion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attention to intracultural variation among fathers is relatively rare in studies of fatherhood in small-scale societies, which typically examine culture-level differences, compare fathers with mothers, or both (Fouts 2008;Hames 1992;Harkness and Super 1992;Morelli and Tronick 1992;Munroe 2002). Theoretical and empirical work has also focused on effects of father absence (Belsky, Steinberg, and Draper 1991;Lawson et al 2017;Sear and Mace 2008;Shenk et al 2013), but we know little about how variation between men, as present fathers and husbands, contributes to differences in child physical growth and health in small-scale societies (Winking and Koster 2015).…”
Section: Study Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attention to intracultural variation among fathers is relatively rare in studies of fatherhood in small-scale societies, which typically examine culture-level differences, compare fathers with mothers, or both (Fouts 2008;Hames 1992;Harkness and Super 1992;Morelli and Tronick 1992;Munroe 2002). Theoretical and empirical work has also focused on effects of father absence (Belsky, Steinberg, and Draper 1991;Lawson et al 2017;Sear and Mace 2008;Shenk et al 2013), but we know little about how variation between men, as present fathers and husbands, contributes to differences in child physical growth and health in small-scale societies (Winking and Koster 2015).…”
Section: Study Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, they may selectively interact with their current offspring, thereby engaging in paternal care. Evidence for the paternal care hypothesis is now well-established in some of the Old World primate species in which relationships between males and infants are common 7 , 9 14 ). Alternatively, males may be investing in their future reproductive success, rather than their current offspring, if affiliating with infants improves their chances of siring infants’ mothers’ future offspring (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social organization is oriented around nuclear family households that often include other adult residents beyond the male and female household heads. For instance, it is common for young married couples to reside with the bride's parents for several years, generally until the couple has a second or third child [ 33 ]. Unmarried individuals are also common, including widows and widowers, bachelors, or divorcées, who collectively comprise about 30% of the population of residents over the age of 18.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%