The Fitness Barometer: A Best Practice Example for Monitoring Motor Performance With Pooled Data Collected From Practitioners

Abstract

Introduction: Motor Performance (MP) in children is an important resource for their future active lifestyle and health. Monitoring of MP is crucial to derive information of trends and to implement specific programs on the base of current MP levels. A variety of MP assessment tools exist, making it difficult to determine a “gold-standard” for assessment and to compare the findings. In Germany, the German Motor Test 6–18 (GMT 6–18) and Kinderturntest Plus 3–10 (KITT+ 3–10) are widely used MP assessment tools. The aim of this paper is to show which key questions can be answered within the context of a best practice example of a MP assessment tool and what can be derived from this for a practical application (the Fitness Barometer).Methods: The raw data of the Fitness Barometer was collected with the MP assessment tools GMT 6–18 and KITT+ 3–10 from 2012 through 2020. Data was pooled anonymously with the e-Research infrastructure MO|REdata and categorized into percentiles for MP and BMI. Overall, we included data of 23,864 children for the statistical analyses. T-tests for independent samples, percentage frequency analysis, descriptive statistics (chi- square-test) and single analysis of variance were conducted.Results and Discussion: Children tested reached a mean value of 57.03 (SD = 18.85). Of the sample, 12.7% children were overweight or obese and there is a significant difference between age groups [χ(4)2 = 178.62, p < 0.001, Cramer V = 0.09; n = 23.656]. The relationship between BMI category and mean value of MP was significant [F(4,19,523) = 224.81, p < 0.001]. During 2020, the year of the COVID-19 pandemic, mean value of endurance and speed decreased [Welch's F(1,573) = 8.08, p = 0.005; Welch's F(1,610) = 35.92, p < 0.001]. The GMT 6–18 and KITT+ 3–10 are valid, objective, reliable, and economic MP assessment tools for monitoring MP levels and derive added practical value. Specific programs and interventions should focus on the findings of these. The Fitness Barometer is a best practice example how a standardized assessment tool of monitoring MP point to trends on which practical evidence-based suggestions can be derived with many various partners and expertise.

Comparison of Physical Fitness Profiles Obtained before and during COVID-19 Pandemic in Two Independent Large Samples of Children and Adolescents: DAFIS Project

“…Physical fitness measurement has emerged as an index of health status in children and youth [ 1 ]. Regular physical fitness evaluation allow monitoring it over time and identifying trends in different population groups [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. To this end, the DAFIS project, integrated in the Plan Galicia Saudable (Healthy Galicia Plan) of the regional government of Galicia (Spain), includes online software that allows the evaluation of the health-related physical fitness of Galician schoolchildren [ 12 ].…”

Impact of Height-to-Mass Ratio on Physical Fitness of German Third-Grade Children

“…Even more generally, such results may reveal temporal and regional trends in society's tness and health status; small negative trends may serve as early warning signals and trigger suitable evidence-based countermeasures by partners and experts 73 . Pre-adolescent snapshots and evaluations of collective PF levels could help implement prevention concepts and raise awareness of the importance of PF for healthy development across the lifespan.…”

Regional differences of physical fitness and overweight and obesity prevalence among college students before and after COVID-19 pandemic since the “double first-class” initiative in China

“…Previous studies showed that individuals with a high level of physical fitness typically have a lower risk of chronic diseases and premature death, including cardiovascular disease (2), cancer (3), hypertension (4), and mental disorder (5). Regular physical fitness measurements and evaluations have emerged as state strategies to monitor the health status and trends of children and adolescents worldwide (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). In China, the National Student Physical Health Standard (revised 2014, short for standard below) has been launched by the Ministry of Education since 2002 (16), collecting and monitoring the physical fitness information of children and adolescents at school age.…”