1985
DOI: 10.5465/256240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Fit between Technology and Structure as a Predictor of Performance in Nursing Subunits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since a higher deviation score implies a lack of fit which should lead to lower performance, a negative and significant coefficient for the deviation score would support the hypothesized performance effect of a fit between the two variables of interest. Besides its intuitive appeal, the deviation score procedure was used because it is considered powerful in reflecting nonmonotonic relationships [Alexander and Randolph 1985]. Third, this procedure avoids the multicollinearity problem of interactions and the purely linear notion of fit as measured by residuals of regression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a higher deviation score implies a lack of fit which should lead to lower performance, a negative and significant coefficient for the deviation score would support the hypothesized performance effect of a fit between the two variables of interest. Besides its intuitive appeal, the deviation score procedure was used because it is considered powerful in reflecting nonmonotonic relationships [Alexander and Randolph 1985]. Third, this procedure avoids the multicollinearity problem of interactions and the purely linear notion of fit as measured by residuals of regression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of EMC was proposed by Zhu et al (2005). This study uses a matching formulation that is widely used to measure the alignment between two organizations (Alexander and Randolph, 1985). The formulation is computed as jEMC b À EMC S j, which indicates the degree of gap in the evaluation of the suppliers' environmental capabilities.…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alexander and Randolph (1985), Fry and Slocum (1984), Khandwalla (1974), and Sutton and Rousseau (1979) included a surveillence component in their formalization measures and were not included in the formalization analyses. 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%