2020
DOI: 10.3386/w27131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The First Weeks of the Coronavirus Crisis: Who Got Hit, When and Why? Evidence from Norway

Abstract: This article is part of the report from the research project "Temporary and permanent layoffs under Covid-19". Thanks to the Norwegian Directorate of Labour and Welfare and Statistics Norway for supplying the registry data, to Trond Vigtel for assistance with the data, and to Maria Hoen for assistance with the linking of data from the O*NET database to Norwegian occupation codes. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Rese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
58
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
9
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We make several contributions to the emerging literature on socio-economic aspects of COVID-19 consequences. A first strand of this literature highlighted the unequal consequences of the COVID crisis on individuals' labor market outcomes (Adams-Prassl et al, 2020;Alstadsaeter et al, 2020;Borjas and Cassidy, 2020;Fairlie et al, 2020;Montenovo et al, 2020;Yasenov, 2020). These papers tend to show that the crisis primarily affected vulnerable groups in terms of income or job loss, especially ethnic minorities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We make several contributions to the emerging literature on socio-economic aspects of COVID-19 consequences. A first strand of this literature highlighted the unequal consequences of the COVID crisis on individuals' labor market outcomes (Adams-Prassl et al, 2020;Alstadsaeter et al, 2020;Borjas and Cassidy, 2020;Fairlie et al, 2020;Montenovo et al, 2020;Yasenov, 2020). These papers tend to show that the crisis primarily affected vulnerable groups in terms of income or job loss, especially ethnic minorities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, our lockdown index relies on an occupation's need for physical proximity instead of the ability to perform the job from home, which we find more suitable, at least in the Swiss setting 5 . Similar lockdown indexes were applied by Béland et al (2020) and Mongey et al (2020) to the USA, by Pouliakas and Branka (2020) to the EU, and by Alstadsaeter et al (2020) to Norway. Using individual-level administrative data for Norway, Alstadsaeter et al (2020) could report individual labor market outcomes (unemployment, short-time work) and link them to the occupational characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…We worked with individual data from a pre-crisis survey and highly aggregated official unemployment and short-time work figures. At the same time, researchers in Norway (Alstadsaeter et al 2020) were able to observe the labor market status of the universe of Norwegian workers in administrative data along with detailed information about worker, household, job, and firm characteristics. They were even able to match information about income payments and bank account balances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…90% of all the new unemployed were laid off temporarily. As documented by Alstadsaeter et al (2020), there was a clear social gradient in who was laid off during the first weeks of the crisis, with a higher risk of layoff for employees with lower education, lower annual income, and lower hourly wage…”
Section: Institutional Setting 21 the Covid-19 Lockdown In Norwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 The effects of the lockdown shock were heterogeneous in nature. Some sectors were forced to close down by the government, while others kept regular activity levels (Alstadsaeter et al, 2020). Figure 2 illustrates variation across industries in the effect of the crisis, as revealed by the application data.…”
Section: Variable Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%