2012
DOI: 10.15298/invertzool.09.2.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The first species of Actiniaria, Spongiactis japonica gen.n., sp.n. (Cnidaria: Anthozoa), an obligate symbiont of a glass sponge

Abstract: Spongiactis japonica, a new genus and species of Actiniaria, an obligate symbiont of hexactinellid sponge is described from Sagami Bay, Japan, Pacific Ocean. Numerous small specimens of this sea anemone live in the caves in a superficial layer of the sponge Hyalonema sieboldi and probably reproduce asexually. The species has no acontia and it is taxonomically related to Actinoscyphiidae (which members are believed have lost acontia) and to Hormathiidae (comprising species possessing acontia) but cannot be acco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All families previously included within Actiniaria (except Edwardisiidae, Actinernidae and Halcuriidae): Acontiophoridae [75]; Actiniidae [76]; Actinodendridae [77]; Actinoscyphiidae [78]; Actinostolidae [79]; Aiptasiidae [80]; Aiptasiomorphidae [12]; Aliciidae * [81]; Andresiidae* [13]; Andvakiidae [82]; Antipodactinidae [83]; Amphianthidae [72]; Bathyphelliidae [79]; Boloceroididae * [50]; Capneidae [84]; Condylanthidae [13]; Diadumenidae [78]; Exocoelactinidae* [85]; Gonactiniidae * [86]; Halcampidae [87]; Haliactinidae [12]; Haliplanellidae [88]; Haloclavidae * [89]; Hormathiidae [79]; Homostichanthidae [90]; Iosactinidae [91]; Isanthidae [75]; Kadosactinidae [92]; Limnactiniidae* [60]; Liponematidae [72]; Metridiidae [86]; Mimetridiidae [93]; Minyadidae [94]; Nemanthidae [95]; Nevadneidae* [96]; Octineonidae [97]; Oractinidae [98]; Ostiactinidae [11]; Phelliidae [99]; Phymanthidae [87]; Preactiniidae * [100]; Ptychodactinidae* [101]; Ramireziidae [93]; Sagartiidae [102]; Sagartiomorphidae [103]; Spongiactinidae [104]; Stichodactylidae [87]; Thalassianthidae [105].…”
Section: Appendix 1 Taxonomic Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All families previously included within Actiniaria (except Edwardisiidae, Actinernidae and Halcuriidae): Acontiophoridae [75]; Actiniidae [76]; Actinodendridae [77]; Actinoscyphiidae [78]; Actinostolidae [79]; Aiptasiidae [80]; Aiptasiomorphidae [12]; Aliciidae * [81]; Andresiidae* [13]; Andvakiidae [82]; Antipodactinidae [83]; Amphianthidae [72]; Bathyphelliidae [79]; Boloceroididae * [50]; Capneidae [84]; Condylanthidae [13]; Diadumenidae [78]; Exocoelactinidae* [85]; Gonactiniidae * [86]; Halcampidae [87]; Haliactinidae [12]; Haliplanellidae [88]; Haloclavidae * [89]; Hormathiidae [79]; Homostichanthidae [90]; Iosactinidae [91]; Isanthidae [75]; Kadosactinidae [92]; Limnactiniidae* [60]; Liponematidae [72]; Metridiidae [86]; Mimetridiidae [93]; Minyadidae [94]; Nemanthidae [95]; Nevadneidae* [96]; Octineonidae [97]; Oractinidae [98]; Ostiactinidae [11]; Phelliidae [99]; Phymanthidae [87]; Preactiniidae * [100]; Ptychodactinidae* [101]; Ramireziidae [93]; Sagartiidae [102]; Sagartiomorphidae [103]; Spongiactinidae [104]; Stichodactylidae [87]; Thalassianthidae [105].…”
Section: Appendix 1 Taxonomic Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the small size of this species, less than 5 mm in whole body length even for adults, is prominent in this family. Ultimately, the habitat of this spe- cies is very unique for not only edwardsiids but also for sea anemones in general; only Spongiactis japonica Sanamyan, Sanamyan and Tabachnick, 2012 is recorded to be symbiotic with sponges (Sanamyan et al, 2012). Tempuractis rinkai is quite different from S. japonica in morphological features and, of course, belongs to a quite different taxon at the family level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In contrast to the diversity of sponge-symbiotic zoanthids, only a single species of Actiniaria is known to live in sponges. The first detailed report of a symbiotic relationship between members of Actiniaria and Porifera was about an actiniarian and a hexactinellid sponge (Sanamyan et al, 2012). According to Sanamyan et al (2012), the host sponge Hyalonema sieboldi Gray, 1832 forms "specific minute volcano-like rises" above the sea anemone Spongiactis japonica.…”
Section: Symbiosis Between Tempuractis Rinkai Sp Nov and Oscarella Spmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant notes on cnidae terminology: Regardless of whether only Diadumene lineata or more species of the genus possess p-mastigophores B1 in acontia and the reliable identification of nematocysts in this category, the choice of nomenclature used to differentiate p-mastigophores may reveal or obscure this feature. The terminology used by Sanamyan et al (2012) to classify p-mastigophores (i.e., Schmidt, 1969, 1972, 1974, modified by den Hartog, 1995 identifies nematocysts without a "Faltstück" (i.e., without a divided shaft) but with bilateral symmetry as p-mastigophores B2a. By incorporating the modification of den Hartog (1995), differences between D. lineata and other species in the genus as well as among diadumenids and other metridioidean families with "true" p-mastigophores B2a with a Faltstück in the acontia gets blurred (e.g., den Hartog and Ates, 2011;Kovtun et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow a nematocyst terminology similar to the one used by Sanamyan et al (2012), which combines the classification of Weill (1934), modified by Carlgren (1940) and thus differentiating "basitrichs" from "b-mastigophores, " with that of Schmidt (1969Schmidt ( , 1972Schmidt ( , 1974, which captures the underlying variation seen in "rhabdoids. " Unlike Sanamyan et al (2012), we do not modify Schmidt's (1969Schmidt's ( , 1972Schmidt's ( , 1974 nomenclature with den Hartog's (1995) notes on p-mastigophores B1 (see Discussion), but agree with the use of "mastigophore" instead of "rhabdoid" to preserve stability. We use a combination of classifications to better capture the underlying variation in cnida morphology given its imperative nature to actiniarian taxonomy, but do not imply any evolutionary relationship among these types.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%