1980
DOI: 10.2307/817420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The First Freedom: The Tumultuous History of Free Speech in America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…182 Even by 1918, the First Amendment had generated almost no public debate since the rati cation debate in 1791, and both the public and the Bar had a relatively hazy understanding of the law. 183 Until Cohen v. California(1971), 184 "The Supreme Court itself had never ruled in favor of a free speech claim and lower courts had approved all manner of speech restrictions including the censorship of books and lms, the prohibition of street corner speeches, and asserted bans on labor protests, profanity, and commercial advertising." 185 Further, federal courts rarely entertained First Amendment cases because, until Gitlow v. New York 186 in 1925, it was widely accepted that the First Amendment did not apply to state governments.…”
Section: B the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…182 Even by 1918, the First Amendment had generated almost no public debate since the rati cation debate in 1791, and both the public and the Bar had a relatively hazy understanding of the law. 183 Until Cohen v. California(1971), 184 "The Supreme Court itself had never ruled in favor of a free speech claim and lower courts had approved all manner of speech restrictions including the censorship of books and lms, the prohibition of street corner speeches, and asserted bans on labor protests, profanity, and commercial advertising." 185 Further, federal courts rarely entertained First Amendment cases because, until Gitlow v. New York 186 in 1925, it was widely accepted that the First Amendment did not apply to state governments.…”
Section: B the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charles Schenck, the general secretary of the American Socialist Party, was convicted under the Espionage Act for attempting to cause insubordination among men drafted for the military. 203 In his lea ets, which were mailed directly to drafted men, he argued that the Conscription Act was unconstitutional and, therefore drafted men had the right to oppose the act. 204 Justice Holmes was assigned to write the majority opinion, ruling unanimously in favor of the government to uphold the conviction.…”
Section: Idmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation