2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5cc02646f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The first case of actinide triple helices: pH-dependent structural evolution and kinetically-controlled transformation of two supramolecular conformational isomers

Abstract: The first actinide triple helices, including two supramolecular conformational isomers of uranium(VI), have been synthesized with the aid of a flexible V-shaped ligand and a rigid aromatic base. The isomers exhibit an intriguing pH-dependent structural evolution and a kinetically-controlled transformation via a novel conformational rearrangement of the organic base.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure a, the U1 ion has an almost ideal hexagonal bipyramidal coordination environment defined by six oxygen atoms from three MTB 4− ligands (the U−O bond distances range from 2.455(5) to 2.470(5) Å) in the equatorial plane and two acyl oxygen atoms (the O3=U=O4 angle is 180.00(19)°, and the U=O distances are 1.692(8) and 1.713(9) Å) at the axial positions, respectively (Supporting Information, Table S2). All the angles and bond distances are in good agreement with relevant parameters reported previously . As shown in the Supporting Information, Figure S9a and S10, the shortest loop of 1 consists of four MTB 4− ligands and four uranyl cations.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figure a, the U1 ion has an almost ideal hexagonal bipyramidal coordination environment defined by six oxygen atoms from three MTB 4− ligands (the U−O bond distances range from 2.455(5) to 2.470(5) Å) in the equatorial plane and two acyl oxygen atoms (the O3=U=O4 angle is 180.00(19)°, and the U=O distances are 1.692(8) and 1.713(9) Å) at the axial positions, respectively (Supporting Information, Table S2). All the angles and bond distances are in good agreement with relevant parameters reported previously . As shown in the Supporting Information, Figure S9a and S10, the shortest loop of 1 consists of four MTB 4− ligands and four uranyl cations.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similarly, crystal samples of 1 can also be obtained via the reaction of 2 in DMF. Taking into account the failure of crystal transformation in the solid state, it is reasonable to believe that a dissolution–crystallization process should be involved in the crystal transformation …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inactive terminal oxo groups of uranyl often prevent axial bonding interactions, resulting in any further coordination occurring in the equatorial plane. As a result, uranyl-organic coordination polymers usually prefer to form onedimensional (1D) chains, 10,[15][16][17] or two-dimensional (2D) sheets, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] rather than threedimensional (3D) frameworks that require structural connectivity in the third axial dimension. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] 2D networks or 3D frameworks with large cavities or pores can readily achieve a high degree of self-assembly by an entangled mode in the solid state, and thus afford a variety of intriguing topological structures as well as fascinating properties.…”
Section:  Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polypyridyl chelating N‐donors feature relatively large binding affinities for f‐element ions (specifically the [UO 2 ] 2+ cation) 36. Some of the ligands of this class, such as 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen) and 2,2′:6′,2″‐terpyridine (terpy) (and its derivatives), have been explored as “capping” ligands in the synthesis uranyl coordination polymers,18,3740 molecular uranyl materials,4144 and lanthanide hybrid materials 4547. Herein we are using these ligands explicitly as tools for crystal engineering by the chelation of part of the equatorial uranyl coordination sphere, thus promoting further assembly by halogen or hydrogen bonding, π–π stacking interactions, or a combination thereof.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%