2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The first 62 AGNs observed with SDSS-IV MaNGA – I. Their characterization and definition of a control sample

Abstract: We report the characterization of the first 62 MaNGA Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) hosts in the Fifth Product Launch (MPL-5) and the definition of a control sample of non-active galaxies. This control sample -comprising two galaxies for each AGNwas selected in order to match the AGN hosts in terms of stellar mass, redshift, visual morphology and inclination. The stellar masses are in the range 9.4 < log (M/M ) < 11.5, and most objects have redshifts ≤ 0.08. The AGN sample is mostly comprised of low-luminosity A… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
96
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
10
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that this AGN selection is different to the ones used in Rembold et al (2017) or Sanchez et al (2017) who both present results on AGN in MaNGA. The main difference in the sample selection is that both of these works only use the photoionisation signatures in the central region of the galaxies to classify a galaxy as an AGN candidate.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We note that this AGN selection is different to the ones used in Rembold et al (2017) or Sanchez et al (2017) who both present results on AGN in MaNGA. The main difference in the sample selection is that both of these works only use the photoionisation signatures in the central region of the galaxies to classify a galaxy as an AGN candidate.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The aim of this work is to compare the kinematic characteristics of the [OIII] emission line for MaNGA-selected AGN and non-AGN in the MaNGA sample. In optical surveys, emission line flux ratios and diagnostic diagrams are the most common way to identify AGN (Baldwin et al 1981;Osterbrock 1989;Zakamska et al 2003;Kauffmann et al 2003;Kewley et al 2006;Reyes et al 2008;Yuan et al 2016). But a major caveat of large optical spectroscopic surveys such as the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (prior to MaNGA) is the small size of the optical fibres which, at 3 diameter (in the case of SDSS-I to SDSS-III surveys), only cover a fraction of the footprint of a galaxy and are only sensitive to processes close to the galactic center.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Four recent studies using the same MPL-5 sample identify 62 AGN hosts using the SDSS-III DR12 (Alam et al 2015) integrated nuclear spectra, that comprises the central 3 × 3 region of the select galaxies. Rembold et al (2017) presents the sample and a study of the nuclear stellar populations with starlight (Cid Fernandes et al 2005). Their classification is based on the BPT diagram togheter with the WHAN diagram, i.e., less restrictive regarding the hardness of the ionization field (they do not use [S ii]/Hα and [O i]/Hα ratios in the classification scheme).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Agn Classification Schemes For Ifs Datamentioning
confidence: 99%