The firm-specific and macroeconomic determinants of the financial structure of construction companies in selected European countries

Abstract

This research builds on previous studies in the field of financial structure and develops knowledge for the construction industry in eight selected countries in Central and Eastern Europe – Visegrád Group, Austria, Bulgaria, Slovenia, and Romania. The aim of the research is to examine the influence of profitability, asset structure, the GDP growth rate and the reference interest rate on the level of total, long-term and short-term debt of companies. The research period is from 2009 to 2018. The main conclusion of the research is the finding that the amount of debt of selected construction companies is most affected by the determinants of the external environment – the development of the economy and the reference interest rate. This conclusion applies regardless of the size of the companies. The direction of the resulting impact differs, as each of the economies underwent a different economic development during the period under review. The interest rate negatively affected the amount of debt of Polish, Romanian and Hungarian companies, given the higher interest rates in these economies; the remaining companies have a positive impact. The impact of the GDP growth rate on the amount of debt is mainly negative for Romanian companies regardless of size, medium-sized Polish and Austrian companies, and large Czech companies; a positive effect was found for the remaining companies. Economies have grown for most of the period under review, and negative impacts may mean taking advantage of profits, which usually grow during periods of prosperity and are a cheap source of funding. This does not necessarily mean economic problems and, as a result, declining debt due to the unavailability of debt financing.

Human Capital Efficiency and Firm Performance of Quality-Certified Firms from EFQM Excellence Model: A Dynamic Panel Data Study

“…Moreover, with the value of the Hansen test in GMM, one can easily observe the validity of instrumental variables (IV). Additionally, numerous scholars employed the two-step system GMM in the most recent studies (Yousaf, 2023a;Rehman et al, 2022;Gul et al, 2022;Růčková and Škuláňová, 2022;Oppong et al, 2019). Consequently, we also employed the two-step system GMM to estimate Model 1 and Model 2 2 .…”

The Relevance of Sectoral Clustering in Corporate Debt Policy: The Case Study of Slovak Enterprises

“…These investigations have, however, mainly been performed within one industry or using simple industry dummies across industries. Studies have focused on the statistical and economic significance of estimated coefficients but not on the reasons for the difference in leverage, which goes beyond such an analysis, in cases where single industries have not been examined, such as construction (Ruckova and Skulanova 2022), tourism (Athari and Bahreini 2023), manufacturing (Sardo et al 2022), the financial sector (Boateng et al 2022), and the non-financial sector (Bazhair and Alshareef 2022;Khan et al 2023). On the contrary, Yang et al (2015) concluded that almost all the studies carried out in China regarding debt examinations do not recognize differences among business sectors.…”

Has the COVID-19 pandemic affected the corporate financial performance? A case study of Slovak enterprises

“…Although a higher level of indebtedness may not explicitly mean a negative, since the cost of equity capital is higher compared to the cost of foreign capital (Valaskova et al, 2019), it is nevertheless true that the higher the indebtedness of the firm, the greater the risk of the business arises, which results in a more difficult acquisition of debt financing (Durana et al, 2021). Another reason why high indebtedness does not necessarily mean a negative is that its growth contributes to increasing profitability or market value (Kovacova et al, 2022), but only in financially stable companies (Ruckova & Skulanova, 2022). There is also no direct connection between indebtedness and the insolvency of a firm, because a higher level of corporate debt does not automatically lead to insolvency (Krabec & Cizinska, 2022), and therefore it is necessary to compare these indicators with liquidity indicators (Zaremba, 2016).…”