2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13662-021-03524-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The finite volume element method for the two-dimensional space-fractional convection–diffusion equation

Abstract: We develop a fully discrete finite volume element scheme of the two-dimensional space-fractional convection–diffusion equation using the finite volume element method to discretize the space-fractional derivative and Crank–Nicholson scheme for time discretization. We also analyze and prove the stability and convergence of the given scheme. Finally, we validate our theoretical analysis by data from three examples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows the effect of applying uniform and non-uniform PDQM on computation of solute concentration υ(x, t) at β = 1.85, C x = 2, L = 8. It is noticed that the L ∞ error is decreasing when the grid points are increasing, that is, the PDQM is stability in the x-direction, as well as the computed results via non-uniform grids are higher agree with earlier numerical solutions [13,42,43,59] than uniform ones. Also, L ∞ error (1.0885 × 10 −6 ) and performance time (0.17 s) for non-uniform PDQM achieved the least.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 shows the effect of applying uniform and non-uniform PDQM on computation of solute concentration υ(x, t) at β = 1.85, C x = 2, L = 8. It is noticed that the L ∞ error is decreasing when the grid points are increasing, that is, the PDQM is stability in the x-direction, as well as the computed results via non-uniform grids are higher agree with earlier numerical solutions [13,42,43,59] than uniform ones. Also, L ∞ error (1.0885 × 10 −6 ) and performance time (0.17 s) for non-uniform PDQM achieved the least.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The primary objective of our paper is to evaluate the performance, validity, efficiency, and accuracy of the developed techniques. We confirm this by comparing the computed results with existing numerical solutions [13,42,43,59] and analytical solutions [40,41,44]. To assess the convergence and accuracy of the developed methods, we use the error computation method outlined in [13,42,43,59]:…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations